Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 15, 2026·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Florida Panthers 2, Seattle Kraken 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 52% of the time.

SEA winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA1100718225
SEA3131527625

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:28SEABen MeyersAssists: Ryan Winterton, Frederick Gaudreau · Deflected, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:52SEABerkly CattonAssists: Kaapo Kakko, Jamie Oleksiak · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–2
  3. P1 12:07FLAVinnie HinostrozaAssists: Luke Kunin, Jesper Boqvist · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P1 18:24SEARyan WintertonGWGAssists: Ben Meyers, Brandon Montour · Bat, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P2 3:20SEAKaapo KakkoAssists: Vince Dunn, Berkly Catton · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–4
  6. P3 10:07SEABobby McMannPPAssists: Kaapo Kakko, Eeli Tolvanen · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–5
  7. P3 14:37SEAJamie OleksiakAssists: Bobby McMann, Jordan Eberle · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–6
  8. P3 19:58FLAEetu LuostarinenAssists: Gustav Forsling, Mackie Samoskevich · Backhand, 0.04 xG2–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 13:30SEARyan Lindgren: Holding2 min
  2. P2 7:23SEAChandler Stephenson: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 8:27SEAEeli Tolvanen: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 11:28FLALuke Kunin: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 1:18FLAEvan Rodrigues: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 9:01FLAAnton Lundell: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P3 10:38FLAAaron Ekblad: Holding2 min
  8. P3 11:44SEABrandon Montour: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
47% to win53% to win
← FLA attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lundell won the faceoff against Beniers
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLASEA
25Shots on goal25
2.8Expected goals2.7
68Shot attempts43
35Faceoffs won26
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
26Hits17
9Blocked shots14
11Giveaways13
1Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestVerhaeghe – Rodrigues – Samoskevich6:39

    xG 0.56–0.13 (82%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. Luostarinen – Lundell – Samoskevich5:33

    xG 0.37–0.13 (74%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0

  3. Verhaeghe – Rodrigues – Tkachuk5:06

    xG 0.24–0.00 (99%)attempts 11–1goals 0–0

  4. Tkachuk – Luostarinen – Lundell6:07

    xG 0.17–0.19 (48%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkblad – Forsling14:44

    xG 0.81–0.44 (65%)attempts 28–8goals 2–1

  2. Kulikov – Sebrango11:58

    xG 0.28–0.37 (43%)attempts 7–7goals 0–2

  3. Kulikov – Mikkola2:32

    xG 0.01–0.10 (9%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestGaudreau – Winterton – Meyers11:07

    xG 0.64–0.56 (53%)attempts 8–16goals 2–1

  2. Kakko – Wright – Catton6:17

    xG 0.28–0.28 (50%)attempts 5–7goals 1–1

  3. Eberle – McMann – Beniers10:22

    xG 0.47–0.51 (48%)attempts 4–9goals 1–0

  4. Stephenson – McCann – Tolvanen8:12

    xG 0.20–0.36 (36%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOleksiak – Evans12:31

    xG 1.01–0.22 (82%)attempts 11–13goals 2–0

  2. Larsson – Dunn11:41

    xG 0.45–0.38 (55%)attempts 7–10goals 1–1

  3. Montour – Dunn2:34

    xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 2.7 xGFLA 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 41/100 · #824 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.79 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +13 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 52% of the time.

SEA winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).