Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 21, 2026·Little Caesars Arena, Detroit

Boston Bruins 4, Detroit Red Wings 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 60% of the time.

DET winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS01011037427
DET010111123244

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 3:35DETLucas RaymondPPAssists: Andrew Copp, Patrick Kane · Snap, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:07BOSDavid PastrnakPPAssists: Charlie McAvoy, Morgan Geekie · Slap, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P3 4:06DETAlex DeBrincatAssists: Moritz Seider · Snap, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P3 6:22BOSElias LindholmAssists: Morgan Geekie, Mason Lohrei · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P3 9:42BOSNikita ZadorovGWGAssists: Morgan Geekie, Charlie McAvoy · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:08BOSMarat KhusnutdinovENAssists: David Pastrnak, Elias Lindholm · Wrist, 0.62 xG4–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:05DETMason Appleton: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 15:41BOSMark Kastelic: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 18:57BOSCasey Mittelstadt: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 3:04BOSHampus Lindholm: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 4:35DETDavid Perron: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 4:43DETMoritz Seider: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P3 7:11BOSJonathan Aspirot: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 13:52DETPatrick Kane: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
47% to win53% to win
← BOS attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kuraly won the faceoff against Copp
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSDET
27Shots on goal44
4.1Expected goals3.4
52Shot attempts68
22Faceoffs won33
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
21Hits22
12Blocked shots13
16Giveaways9
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestKuraly – Jeannot – Kastelic5:58

    xG 0.42–0.32 (57%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

  2. Lindholm – Geekie – Reichel7:50

    xG 0.33–0.32 (51%)attempts 7–9goals 1–0

  3. Arvidsson – Zacha – Mittelstadt10:46

    xG 0.17–0.35 (33%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  4. Pastrnak – Khusnutdinov – Minten12:58

    xG 0.26–0.64 (29%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindholm – Lohrei11:00

    xG 0.82–0.12 (87%)attempts 11–8goals 1–1

  2. Zadorov – McAvoy2:07

    xG 0.03–0.02 (60%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

  3. McAvoy – Aspirot14:00

    xG 0.38–0.72 (35%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestPerron – Raymond – Finnie12:55

    xG 0.82–0.30 (73%)attempts 14–6goals 0–1

  2. Copp – Appleton – Kasper7:57

    xG 0.30–0.02 (93%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  3. Kane – Compher – DeBrincat11:01

    xG 0.47–0.40 (54%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0

  4. van Riemsdyk – Shine – Dries3:02

    xG 0.01–0.41 (2%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChiarot – Faulk16:14

    xG 0.69–0.25 (73%)attempts 20–9goals 0–1

  2. Seider – Edvinsson13:23

    xG 0.42–0.29 (59%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  3. Chiarot – Johansson2:10

    xG 0.04–0.02 (62%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 3.4 xGBOS 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 70/100 · #458 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.91 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 18% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 60% of the time.

DET winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).