Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 28, 2026·TD Garden, Boston

Minnesota Wild 3, Boston Bruins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

BOS winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN01211329334
BOS29112310631

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:01BOSAndrew PeekeAssists: David Pastrnak, Fraser Minten · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:00BOSPavel ZachaAssists: Viktor Arvidsson, Casey Mittelstadt · Snap, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P2 10:27BOSViktor ArvidssonAssists: David Pastrnak, Hampus Lindholm · Snap, 0.03 xG0–3
  4. P2 14:46MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Ryan Hartman, Brock Faber · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P3 3:48BOSElias LindholmGWGAssists: Lukas Reichel, Hampus Lindholm · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–4
  6. P3 7:57MINMats ZuccarelloPPAssists: Quinn Hughes · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–4
  7. P3 13:44MINRyan HartmanAssists: Quinn Hughes, Mats Zuccarello · Bat, 0.13 xG3–4
  8. P3 16:50BOSPavel ZachaAssists: Casey Mittelstadt · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:26BOSElias LindholmENAssists: Casey Mittelstadt · Wrist, 0.72 xG3–6
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 6:22MINNick Foligno: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 6:22BOSTanner Jeannot: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 13:50BOSMark Kastelic: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 13:50MINMichael McCarron: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 17:04MINMats Zuccarello: Interference2 min
  6. P2 15:09BOSFraser Minten: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 6:09BOSNikita Zadorov: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. P3 6:09BOSMarat Khusnutdinov: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 10:00MINJonas Brodin: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hartman won the faceoff against Minten
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINBOS
34Shots on goal31
4.1Expected goals3.2
84Shot attempts66
25Faceoffs won33
3Power plays2
11Penalty minutes13
19Hits20
11Blocked shots23
22Giveaways18
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Foligno – Trenin8:29

    xG 0.66–0.13 (83%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  2. Zuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov9:59

    xG 0.75–0.71 (52%)attempts 17–14goals 2–3

  3. Johansson – McCarron – Brink6:08

    xG 0.03–0.31 (10%)attempts 4–10goals 0–1

  4. Tarasenko – Eriksson Ek – Boldy10:48

    xG 0.39–0.75 (34%)attempts 11–19goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Middleton9:29

    xG 0.70–0.21 (77%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0

  2. Hughes – Faber19:01

    xG 1.01–1.06 (49%)attempts 26–26goals 1–3

  3. Bogosian – Brodin2:01

    xG 0.00–0.15 (0%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestArvidsson – Zacha – Mittelstadt7:08

    xG 0.63–0.54 (53%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

  2. Lindholm – Geekie – Reichel8:41

    xG 0.36–0.39 (48%)attempts 11–9goals 1–1

  3. Kuraly – Jeannot – Kastelic7:46

    xG 0.35–0.48 (42%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  4. Lindholm – Pastrnak – Geekie2:02

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcAvoy – Aspirot13:07

    xG 0.66–0.43 (61%)attempts 20–15goals 1–1

  2. Lindholm – McAvoy2:29

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  3. Lindholm – Lohrei10:10

    xG 0.53–0.74 (42%)attempts 6–16goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 3.2 xGMIN 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #302 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.89 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +13 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

BOS winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).