Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 2, 2026·Crypto.com Arena, Los Angeles

Nashville Predators 5, Los Angeles Kings 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 74% of the time.

LAK winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
NSH2182905021534
LAK09310113010433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:52NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Jonathan Marchessault, Erik Haula · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:47NSHZachary L'HeureuxAssists: Brady Skjei · Backhand, 0.14 xG2–0
  3. P2 2:02NSHJonathan MarchessaultAssists: Matthew Wood, Justin Barron · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–0
  4. P2 6:09LAKAdrian KempeAssists: Artemi Panarin · Deflected, 0.16 xG3–1
  5. P2 8:19NSHSteven StamkosAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.17 xG4–1
  6. P2 13:29LAKAdrian KempeAssists: Joel Edmundson, Anze Kopitar · Snap, 0.16 xG4–2
  7. P2 15:45LAKScott LaughtonAssists: Joel Armia, Mikey Anderson · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–3
  8. P3 9:57LAKJoel ArmiaAssists: Jared Wright, Brian Dumoulin · Wrist, 0.18 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. LAK Adrian Kempe stopped
  2. 2. NSH Ryan O'Reilly stopped
  3. 3. LAK Artemi Panarin stopped
  4. 4. NSH Filip Forsberg stopped
  5. 5. LAK Trevor Moore stopped
  6. 6. NSH Steven Stamkos stopped
  7. 7. LAK Anze Kopitar stopped
  8. 8. NSH Jonathan Marchessault stopped
  9. 9. LAK Alex Laferriere stopped
  10. 10. NSH Erik Haula stopped
  11. 11. LAK Brandt Clarke stopped
  12. 12. NSH Tyson Jost stopped
  13. 13. LAK Quinton Byfield stopped
  14. 14. NSH Roman Josi stopped
  15. 15. LAK Joel Armia stopped
  16. 16. NSH Luke Evangelista scored
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 14:25LAKJoel Edmundson: Interference2 min
  2. P1 18:40NSHBrady Skjei: Holding2 min
  3. P1 19:51LAKDarcy Kuemper: Penalty shot throwing object at puck0 min
  4. P3 1:25LAKArtemi Panarin: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 3:01NSHJonathan Marchessault: Interference2 min
  6. P3 6:53LAKJared Wright: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 13:05NSHBrady Skjei: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
47% to win53% to win
← NSH attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Laferriere
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHLAK
34Shots on goal33
4.0Expected goals2.4
72Shot attempts68
32Faceoffs won41
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
19Hits32
16Blocked shots15
12Giveaways20
7Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – O'Reilly – L'Heureux10:29

    xG 0.86–0.20 (81%)attempts 15–10goals 2–0

  2. Haula – Jost – Evangelista3:07

    xG 0.56–0.37 (60%)attempts 5–6goals 0–2

  3. Svechkov – Kemell – Schaefer6:12

    xG 0.16–0.19 (46%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  4. Jost – Evangelista – Wood3:09

    xG 0.04–0.10 (28%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Skjei17:18

    xG 1.61–0.25 (86%)attempts 24–16goals 2–0

  2. Hague – Perbix12:25

    xG 0.51–0.65 (44%)attempts 12–15goals 1–2

  3. Barron – Wilsby13:01

    xG 0.41–0.75 (35%)attempts 13–17goals 1–1

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestArmia – Laughton – Wright8:58

    xG 0.65–0.26 (71%)attempts 12–13goals 2–2

  2. Joseph – Helenius – Ward4:59

    xG 0.03–0.03 (44%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Moore – Byfield – Laferriere13:01

    xG 0.49–0.96 (34%)attempts 13–19goals 0–0

  4. Kopitar – Kempe – Panarin11:18

    xG 0.53–1.16 (31%)attempts 19–14goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDoughty – Anderson6:47

    xG 0.36–0.13 (73%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  2. Dumoulin – Ceci5:07

    xG 0.32–0.44 (42%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  3. Ceci – Anderson9:10

    xG 0.41–0.58 (41%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 2.4 xGNSH 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #91 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.05 · 8 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 74% of the time.

LAK winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).