Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 5, 2026·Little Caesars Arena, Detroit

Minnesota Wild 5, Detroit Red Wings 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 55% of the time.

DET winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN064717520
DET1306315424

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:40DETAlbert JohanssonAssists: Axel Sandin-Pellikka, Patrick Kane · Snap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:18MINMatt BoldyAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:25MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Ryan Hartman, Mats Zuccarello · Deflected, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:03MINVladimir TarasenkoAssists: Jake Middleton, Ryan Hartman · Snap, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P2 12:32MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Brock Faber · Snap, 0.09 xG4–1
  6. P3 7:18DETAxel Sandin-PellikkaAssists: Dylan Larkin, Lucas Raymond · Snap, 0.01 xG4–2
  7. P3 11:14DETJ.T. CompherAssists: Simon Edvinsson, Marco Kasper · Tip-in, 0.08 xG4–3
  8. P3 14:36DETPatrick KaneAssists: Alex DeBrincat, Andrew Copp · Backhand, 0.12 xG4–4
  9. P3 18:09MINKirill KaprizovPPGWGAssists: Matt Boldy, Mats Zuccarello · Slap, 0.05 xG5–4
Penalties (3)
  1. P2 2:17MINDanila Yurov: Roughing2 min
  2. P2 4:57DETAxel Sandin-Pellikka: Slashing2 min
  3. P3 16:23DETPatrick Kane: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against Larkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINDET
20Shots on goal24
2.6Expected goals2.4
46Shot attempts71
22Faceoffs won35
2Power plays1
2Penalty minutes4
25Hits18
25Blocked shots8
13Giveaways14
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestTarasenko – Trenin – Yurov9:42

    xG 0.42–0.32 (57%)attempts 3–8goals 0–1

  2. Zuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov12:52

    xG 0.66–0.63 (51%)attempts 15–16goals 2–2

  3. Foligno – Foligno – McCarron9:13

    xG 0.14–0.26 (34%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  4. Johansson – Eriksson Ek – Boldy12:03

    xG 0.18–0.56 (25%)attempts 5–19goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Spurgeon – Brodin13:38

    xG 0.33–0.38 (47%)attempts 11–17goals 0–0

  2. Petry – Middleton12:59

    xG 0.73–0.82 (47%)attempts 10–15goals 0–2

  3. Hughes – Faber18:36

    xG 0.47–0.68 (41%)attempts 11–21goals 2–2

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Copp – DeBrincat13:57

    xG 0.58–0.16 (79%)attempts 24–7goals 1–0

  2. Perron – Compher – Kasper10:20

    xG 0.83–0.41 (67%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Larkin – Raymond – Finnie11:33

    xG 0.36–0.38 (49%)attempts 15–7goals 1–2

  4. van Riemsdyk – Rasmussen – Mazur8:04

    xG 0.03–0.26 (10%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChiarot – Bernard-Docker12:02

    xG 0.44–0.27 (62%)attempts 21–6goals 0–1

  2. Chiarot – Sandin-Pellikka4:17

    xG 0.31–0.15 (68%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Seider – Edvinsson19:39

    xG 0.59–0.48 (55%)attempts 18–14goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 2.4 xGMIN 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #65 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.09 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 55% of the time.

DET winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).