Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 7, 2026·Centre Bell, Montreal

Florida Panthers 3, Montréal Canadiens 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 61% of the time.

MTL winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
FLA11111017050333
MTL0717215032432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:23FLACarter VerhaegheAssists: Donovan Sebrango · Snap, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:54MTLIvan DemidovPPAssists: Cole Caufield, Juraj Slafkovský · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:43FLACole ReinhardtAssists: Luke Kunin, Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P3 6:22MTLPhillip DanaultAssists: Noah Dobson, Adam Engstrom · Snap, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P3 7:49FLAEetu LuostarinenAssists: Gustav Forsling, Jesper Boqvist · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:39MTLNick SuzukiAssists: Lane Hutson, Juraj Slafkovský · Snap, 0.26 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. MTL Cole Caufield scored
  2. 2. FLA Eetu Luostarinen stopped
  3. 3. MTL Alexandre Texier scored
  4. 4. FLA Sam Bennett stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 1:31MTLAdam Engstrom: Holding2 min
  2. P1 10:47FLADmitry Kulikov: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 17:58FLADonovan Sebrango: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 0:31FLATobias Bjornfot: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 14:25MTLIvan Demidov: Interference2 min
  6. P3 19:48FLATomas Nosek: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
47% to win53% to win
← FLA attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Suzuki won the faceoff against Luostarinen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAMTL
33Shots on goal32
4.2Expected goals3.5
57Shot attempts68
28Faceoffs won37
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
29Hits26
18Blocked shots11
13Giveaways13
7Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestGreer – Boqvist – Luostarinen11:03

    xG 0.57–0.34 (63%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  2. Nosek – Gregor – Schwindt9:38

    xG 0.47–0.29 (62%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Verhaeghe – Bennett – Samoskevich13:22

    xG 0.60–0.49 (55%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  4. Hinostroza – Kunin – Reinhardt8:52

    xG 0.40–0.44 (48%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBenning – Sebrango4:32

    xG 0.52–0.03 (95%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  2. Jones – Forsling2:19

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

  3. Forsling – Benning2:20

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestTexier – Newhook – Demidov12:13

    xG 0.67–0.32 (68%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Danault – Anderson – Kapanen9:01

    xG 0.60–0.31 (66%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  3. Suzuki – Caufield – Slafkovský10:04

    xG 0.45–0.33 (58%)attempts 15–4goals 0–1

  4. Evans – Dach – Bolduc10:58

    xG 0.20–0.85 (19%)attempts 5–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHutson – Engstrom2:33

    xG 0.33–0.16 (67%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Struble – Hutson12:37

    xG 0.47–0.46 (51%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  3. Matheson – Dobson16:22

    xG 0.55–0.63 (47%)attempts 16–18goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 3.5 xGFLA 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #171 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.42 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 4% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 61% of the time.

MTL winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).