Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 7, 2026·Grand Casino Arena, St. Paul

Seattle Kraken 2, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 61% of the time.

MIN winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SEA2130608227
MIN1921129529

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:23SEABrandon MontourAssists: Kaapo Kakko, Jaden Schwartz · Slap, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:57MINMatt BoldyAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Marcus Johansson · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:10SEAAdam LarssonAssists: Chandler Stephenson · Snap, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P2 0:38MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Yakov Trenin · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:46MINVladimir TarasenkoGWGAssists: Ryan Hartman, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P3 6:49MINMarcus JohanssonAssists: Matt Boldy, Joel Eriksson Ek · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–4
  7. P3 17:17MINJoel Eriksson EkENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.65 xG2–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 8:22MINVladimir Tarasenko: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 14:24MINMarcus Foligno: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 14:24SEAJamie Oleksiak: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 6:29MINMats Zuccarello: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P2 10:34SEARyker Evans: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 16:52MINBrock Faber: Interference2 min
  7. P3 14:50MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 14:50SEABrandon Montour: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← SEA attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00McCarron won the faceoff against Gaudreau
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEAMIN
27Shots on goal29
2.4Expected goals3.0
64Shot attempts47
24Faceoffs won24
3Power plays1
9Penalty minutes13
9Hits15
11Blocked shots18
15Giveaways20
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestEberle – McMann – Beniers11:37

    xG 0.47–0.31 (60%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

  2. Tolvanen – Meyers – Fisker Molgaard6:04

    xG 0.19–0.12 (61%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Schwartz – McCann – Fisker Molgaard2:00

    xG 0.19–0.12 (61%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Stephenson – Kakko – Catton9:03

    xG 0.25–0.43 (37%)attempts 9–6goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Dunn15:02

    xG 0.64–0.54 (54%)attempts 19–15goals 1–0

  2. Montour – Evans2:37

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Oleksiak – Evans13:04

    xG 0.34–0.39 (47%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – McCarron – Trenin8:07

    xG 0.45–0.06 (88%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  2. Johansson – Eriksson Ek – Boldy7:40

    xG 0.49–0.46 (52%)attempts 8–9goals 2–0

  3. Zuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov14:59

    xG 0.68–0.64 (51%)attempts 13–12goals 0–0

  4. Tarasenko – Brink – Yurov9:14

    xG 0.30–0.34 (47%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Brodin13:01

    xG 0.64–0.13 (84%)attempts 13–9goals 2–0

  2. Hughes – Faber16:16

    xG 0.43–0.38 (53%)attempts 14–14goals 1–1

  3. Middleton – Hughes2:13

    xG 0.14–0.13 (52%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.0 xGSEA 2.4 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 55/100 · #632 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.39 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 61% of the time.

MIN winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).