Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Apr 8, 2026·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Edmonton Oilers 5, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 62% of the time.

SJS winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM2831107526
SJS131704214

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:27SJSMacklin CelebriniPPAssists: Dmitry Orlov, Will Smith · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:18EDMConnor McDavidPPAssists: Evan Bouchard, Vasily Podkolzin · Poke, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:38EDMVasily PodkolzinPPAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Connor McDavid · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P2 3:33EDMJack RoslovicPPGWGAssists: Connor McDavid · Backhand, 0.17 xG3–1
  5. P2 4:37SJSKiefer SherwoodAssists: Alexander Wennberg, William Eklund · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P2 5:53EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Evan Bouchard, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.18 xG4–2
  7. P2 14:13EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Jack Roslovic · Wrist, 0.16 xG5–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 3:38EDMJack Roslovic: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  2. P1 5:15SJSMichael Misa: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:43EDMMatt Savoie: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 17:18SJSVincent Desharnais: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  5. P2 2:31SJSMacklin Celebrini: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P2 9:28EDMJack Roslovic: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win53% to win
← EDM attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Wennberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMSJS
26Shots on goal14
2.3Expected goals1.8
58Shot attempts41
22Faceoffs won23
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
33Hits19
12Blocked shots15
13Giveaways21
2Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestFrederic – Dach – Samanski7:26

    xG 0.28–0.15 (65%)attempts 8–4goals 0–1

  2. McDavid – Podkolzin – Savoie10:15

    xG 0.45–0.33 (58%)attempts 10–6goals 1–0

  3. Henrique – Roslovic – Jones4:22

    xG 0.10–0.02 (84%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  4. Dickinson – Frederic – Dach3:39

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard13:45

    xG 0.63–0.18 (78%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  2. Walman – Emberson15:36

    xG 0.42–0.25 (63%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  3. Murphy – Nurse15:21

    xG 0.56–0.45 (56%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestWennberg – Sherwood – Eklund12:06

    xG 0.44–0.25 (63%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  2. Smith – Celebrini – Graf12:03

    xG 0.38–0.25 (60%)attempts 11–13goals 0–0

  3. Goodrow – Gaudette – Ostapchuk8:01

    xG 0.00–0.16 (2%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  4. Toffoli – Chernyshov – Misa6:34

    xG 0.11–0.31 (26%)attempts 4–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDesharnais – Ferraro4:09

    xG 0.39–0.02 (94%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Orlov – Desharnais11:26

    xG 0.23–0.12 (66%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Orlov – Klingberg3:02

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 1.8 xGEDM 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 54/100 · #658 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.23 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 62% of the time.

SJS winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).