Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 11, 2026·Crypto.com Arena, Los Angeles

Edmonton Oilers 0, Los Angeles Kings 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 51% of the time.

LAK winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM0907011027
LAK190606121

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:34LAKArtemi PanarinGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 13:15LAKDrew Doughty: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 13:15EDMConnor McDavid: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 2:59LAKBrandt Clarke: Interference2 min
  4. P3 14:27EDMConnor McDavid: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
47% to win53% to win
← EDM attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Byfield won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMLAK
27Shots on goal21
2.4Expected goals2.5
64Shot attempts50
24Faceoffs won30
1Power plays1
4Penalty minutes4
28Hits30
16Blocked shots21
15Giveaways10
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestNugent-Hopkins – Kapanen – McDavid2:05

    xG 0.15–0.01 (91%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. McDavid – Podkolzin – Savoie6:39

    xG 0.26–0.16 (62%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  3. Henrique – Lazar – Roslovic6:40

    xG 0.12–0.06 (67%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  4. Kapanen – McDavid – Podkolzin2:04

    xG 0.02–0.06 (22%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard16:57

    xG 0.73–0.39 (65%)attempts 17–12goals 0–1

  2. Walman – Bouchard2:46

    xG 0.25–0.03 (90%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  3. Murphy – Nurse19:11

    xG 0.73–0.57 (56%)attempts 19–18goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestKopitar – Kempe – Panarin13:21

    xG 0.66–0.22 (74%)attempts 17–10goals 1–0

  2. Armia – Laughton – Wright8:26

    xG 0.06–0.13 (31%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  3. Joseph – Helenius – Ward5:24

    xG 0.00–0.24 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

  4. Moore – Byfield – Laferriere14:12

    xG 0.25–0.54 (32%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdmundson – Clarke15:02

    xG 0.73–0.39 (65%)attempts 15–19goals 1–0

  2. Dumoulin – Ceci13:20

    xG 0.12–0.57 (17%)attempts 6–14goals 0–0

  3. Doughty – Anderson17:27

    xG 0.18–0.99 (15%)attempts 12–18goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 2.5 xGEDM 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 0/100 · #1312 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.54 · 1 goal in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 51% of the time.

LAK winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).