Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 14, 2026·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, St. Louis Blues 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 78% of the time.

STL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT381619523
STL15316310731

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:14PITRutger McGroartyAssists: Kevin Hayes · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:40PITAvery HayesUnassisted · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P1 17:23PITAnthony ManthaAssists: Kevin Hayes · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–0
  4. P1 18:44STLJimmy SnuggerudAssists: Robert Thomas · Snap, 0.16 xG3–1
  5. P2 2:58PITElmer SoderblomAssists: Ben Kindel, Anthony Mantha · Wrist, 0.22 xG4–1
  6. P2 4:51STLOskar SundqvistAssists: Alexey Toropchenko, Philip Broberg · Snap, 0.15 xG4–2
  7. P2 10:37STLLogan MaillouxAssists: Jonathan Drouin, Jake Neighbours · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–3
  8. P2 15:49STLJimmy SnuggerudPPAssists: Jake Neighbours, Dylan Holloway · Snap, 0.28 xG4–4
  9. P3 4:11STLDylan HollowayAssists: Jimmy Snuggerud, Robert Thomas · Wrist, 0.11 xG4–5
  10. P3 4:55STLPavel BuchnevichGWGAssists: Jordan Kyrou, Jordan Binnington · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–6
  11. P3 12:20PITAvery HayesAssists: Ryan Shea, Arturs Silovs · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–6
  12. P3 18:17STLDylan HollowayENAssists: Jimmy Snuggerud, Logan Mailloux · Wrist, 0.78 xG5–7
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 14:38PITElmer Soderblom: Interference2 min
  2. P2 10:51STLNathan Walker: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 15:34PITAnthony Mantha: Roughing2 min · PPG
  4. P3 10:15STLDylan Holloway: Holding2 min
  5. P3 19:46PITIlya Solovyov: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Walker won the faceoff against Acciari
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITSTL
23Shots on goal31
2.3Expected goals4.1
50Shot attempts54
31Faceoffs won26
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
15Hits20
10Blocked shots14
21Giveaways15
7Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestNovak – Brazeau – Koivunen11:04

    xG 0.48–0.27 (64%)attempts 14–7goals 0–1

  2. Acciari – Koppanen – Harvey-Pinard8:52

    xG 0.43–0.38 (53%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  3. Hayes – Hayes – McGroarty9:19

    xG 0.40–0.43 (48%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  4. Mantha – Soderblom – Kindel10:58

    xG 0.48–1.15 (29%)attempts 9–12goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. Clifton – Shea15:34

    xG 0.59–0.59 (50%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

  2. Graves – Solovyov12:27

    xG 0.44–0.86 (34%)attempts 13–13goals 2–3

  3. St. Ivany – Livanavage17:46

    xG 0.75–1.23 (38%)attempts 9–22goals 0–2

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestThomas – Holloway – Snuggerud13:29

    xG 1.16–0.37 (76%)attempts 17–11goals 2–1

  2. Buchnevich – Kyrou – Suter10:37

    xG 0.81–0.44 (65%)attempts 10–4goals 1–1

  3. Drouin – Neighbours – Dvorsky10:33

    xG 0.40–0.42 (48%)attempts 9–8goals 1–1

  4. Sundqvist – Walker – Toropchenko9:30

    xG 0.32–0.56 (37%)attempts 4–14goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBroberg – Mailloux14:17

    xG 1.04–0.37 (74%)attempts 20–10goals 3–1

  2. Fowler – Parayko17:13

    xG 0.92–0.30 (76%)attempts 19–8goals 0–2

  3. Tucker – Kessel11:39

    xG 0.43–0.92 (32%)attempts 4–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 4.1 xGPIT 2.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #54 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.94 · 12 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 78% of the time.

STL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).