Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Apr 15, 2026·United Center, Chicago

San Jose Sharks 2, Chicago Blackhawks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 71% of the time.

CHI winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS171604217
CHI03110411524

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:09SJSMario FerraroAssists: Kiefer Sherwood · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:17SJSMichael MisaPPAssists: Dmitry Orlov, Kiefer Sherwood · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P2 19:30CHISam RinzelAssists: Ryan Donato · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P3 3:51CHILouis CrevierAssists: Connor Bedard · Snap, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P3 8:35CHIRyan GreeneGWGAssists: Ethan Del Mastro, Andre Burakovsky · Snap, 0.27 xG2–3
  6. P3 10:32CHILouis CrevierAssists: Tyler Bertuzzi · Slap, 0.02 xG2–4
  7. P3 14:44CHINick LardisAssists: Connor Bedard, Wyatt Kaiser · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 9:31SJSIgor Chernyshov: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 16:22SJSDmitry Orlov: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  3. P1 18:49CHIConnor Bedard: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 3:46CHIConnor Bedard: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  5. P2 8:00CHIRyan Donato: Kneeing2 min
  6. P2 10:14SJSLuca Cagnoni: Holding2 min
  7. P2 17:16SJSShakir Mukhamadullin: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 11:59CHIConnor Bedard: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win53% to win
← SJS attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Celebrini won the faceoff against Bedard
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCHI
17Shots on goal24
1.7Expected goals2.8
41Shot attempts48
22Faceoffs won20
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
26Hits13
10Blocked shots14
15Giveaways11
8Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestGoodrow – Gaudette – Ostapchuk5:45

    xG 0.20–0.14 (59%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Wennberg – Sherwood – Eklund9:20

    xG 0.19–0.29 (40%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  3. Toffoli – Graf – Misa8:32

    xG 0.23–0.41 (36%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  4. Smith – Celebrini – Chernyshov10:29

    xG 0.26–0.47 (36%)attempts 8–12goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrlov – Mukhamadullin11:43

    xG 0.51–0.26 (66%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  2. Desharnais – Dickinson2:04

    xG 0.01–0.09 (9%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Desharnais – Cagnoni12:22

    xG 0.21–0.53 (29%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBurakovsky – Donato – Greene10:06

    xG 0.82–0.03 (97%)attempts 11–4goals 2–0

  2. Nazar – Bedard – Lardis9:30

    xG 0.48–0.11 (81%)attempts 14–6goals 1–1

  3. Teravainen – Lafferty – Slaggert6:29

    xG 0.03–0.12 (21%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Bertuzzi – Mikheyev – Frondell9:03

    xG 0.27–0.48 (36%)attempts 5–14goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKaiser – Rinzel11:11

    xG 0.66–0.02 (98%)attempts 12–4goals 1–0

  2. Del Mastro – Korchinski8:48

    xG 0.59–0.17 (77%)attempts 6–5goals 1–1

  3. Vlasic – Crevier12:34

    xG 0.55–0.36 (60%)attempts 14–13goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.8 xGSJS 1.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHISJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #425 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.53 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 71% of the time.

CHI winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).