Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Sep 30, 2026·Ball Arena, Denver

Los Angeles Kings 4, Colorado Avalanche 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 54% of the time.

COL winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK11321216431
COL21041029829

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:33COLBrock NelsonPPAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Nazem Kadri · Snap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:14LAKBrian DumoulinAssists: Alex Laferriere, Alex Turcotte · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:58COLParker KellyAssists: Josh Manson · Snap, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 0:23COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Nazem Kadri, Cale Makar · Snap, 0.12 xG1–3
  5. P2 1:28LAKJoel ArmiaSHAssists: Erik Haula, Cody Ceci · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P2 8:33COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Martin Necas, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P2 16:01COLNicolas RoyGWGAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Parker Kelly · Poke, 0.14 xG2–5
  8. P2 17:50LAKTrevor MooreSHAssists: Mikey Anderson · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–5
  9. P2 18:34COLArtturi LehkonenPPAssists: Brock Nelson, Devon Toews · Snap, 0.21 xG3–6
  10. P3 11:51LAKArtemi PanarinAssists: Drew Doughty, Alex Laferriere · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–6
  11. P3 14:03COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Cale Makar · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–7
  12. P3 15:06COLArtturi LehkonenPPAssists: Brock Nelson, Devon Toews · Snap, 0.19 xG4–8
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 4:48LAKAndre Lee: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:21COLJaden Schwartz: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 15:55COLDevon Toews: Holding2 min
  4. P1 19:12LAKAdrian Kempe: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:52LAKDrew Doughty: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 12:19COLT.J. Hughes: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 17:15LAKJoel Edmundson: Slashing2 min · PPG
  8. P3 4:30COLNoah Juulsen: Interference2 min
  9. P3 13:20LAKBrandt Clarke: Fighting5 min · PPG
  10. P3 13:20COLNathan MacKinnon: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 14:15LAKAlex Turcotte: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← LAK attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Byfield won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKCOL
31Shots on goal29
2.8Expected goals3.0
62Shot attempts50
37Faceoffs won21
4Power plays5
15Penalty minutes13
17Hits19
15Blocked shots15
10Giveaways12
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestArmia – Lee – Helenius6:17

    xG 0.30–0.14 (69%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  2. Zuccarello – Turcotte – Laferriere10:27

    xG 0.25–0.17 (59%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  3. Kempe – Panarin – Byfield11:56

    xG 0.47–0.68 (41%)attempts 14–14goals 0–2

  4. Haula – Laughton – Moore7:55

    xG 0.18–0.79 (19%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdmundson – Clarke10:42

    xG 0.47–0.13 (78%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  2. Ceci – Anderson11:56

    xG 0.61–0.46 (57%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Doughty – Dumoulin11:36

    xG 0.18–1.08 (14%)attempts 10–12goals 1–3

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. Kadri – MacKinnon – Necas2:05

    xG 0.26–0.25 (52%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Necas9:10

    xG 0.26–0.31 (45%)attempts 7–10goals 1–0

  3. Roy – Kelly – Svechkov2:59

    xG 0.07–0.13 (34%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Kelly – Svechkov – Hughes2:09

    xG 0.02–0.09 (15%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKulak – Malinski7:11

    xG 0.56–0.22 (72%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Manson8:00

    xG 0.48–0.37 (56%)attempts 5–10goals 2–1

  3. Toews – Makar9:57

    xG 0.32–0.41 (44%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.0 xGLAK 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 83/100 · #9 of 52 this seasonSwing 1.46 · 11 goals in reachComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 54% of the time.

COL winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).