Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 3, 2026·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Seattle Kraken 1, Edmonton Oilers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 83% of the time.

EDM winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SEA0511104120
EDM11104211326

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:51EDMOwen MichaelsAssists: Alex Formenton · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 9:06SEABobby McMannPPAssists: Jordan Eberle, Chandler Stephenson · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P3 17:33EDMLeon DraisaitlGWGAssists: Connor McDavid, Ryan Shea · Snap, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P3 18:55EDMConnor McDavidENAssists: Vasily Podkolzin · Wrist, 0.54 xG1–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:58SEARyan Winterton: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 7:27SEAVince Dunn: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 10:14SEARyan Lindgren: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 10:14EDMTrent Frederic: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 13:30SEAVince Dunn: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P1 13:30EDMColton Dach: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P1 14:36SEARyker Evans: High sticking2 min
  8. P1 16:37SEAPhilipp Grubauer: Slashing2 min
  9. P1 16:37EDMMax Jones: Slashing2 min
  10. P2 7:22EDMConnor Murphy: Slashing2 min · PPG
  11. P3 4:07EDMMax Jones: Cross checking2 min
  12. P3 18:55EDMMattias Ekholm: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 18:55SEABrandon Montour: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
47% to win53% to win
← SEA attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Michaels won the faceoff against Stephenson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEAEDM
20Shots on goal26
1.5Expected goals3.5
38Shot attempts62
26Faceoffs won31
2Power plays3
25Penalty minutes23
18Hits31
18Blocked shots8
16Giveaways16
3Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestWinterton – Wright – Catton7:40

    xG 0.21–0.11 (66%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  2. Eberle – Stephenson – McMann11:29

    xG 0.57–0.49 (54%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  3. Gaudreau – Samoskevich – Meyers5:43

    xG 0.08–0.05 (59%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  4. McCann – Kakko – Beniers9:26

    xG 0.29–0.72 (29%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Lindgren – Fleury9:17

    xG 0.23–0.25 (49%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  2. Larsson – Dunn15:47

    xG 0.31–0.72 (30%)attempts 7–19goals 0–0

  3. Montour – Evans14:09

    xG 0.59–1.01 (37%)attempts 12–12goals 0–2

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestDraisaitl – McDavid – Podkolzin14:20

    xG 0.98–0.13 (89%)attempts 19–2goals 1–0

  2. Kapanen – Jones – Dach7:07

    xG 0.16–0.08 (66%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Frederic – Howard – Samanski4:04

    xG 0.12–0.10 (56%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  4. Joseph – Formenton – Michaels9:40

    xG 0.09–0.35 (20%)attempts 5–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard12:51

    xG 0.60–0.18 (77%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  2. Walman – Emberson6:43

    xG 0.29–0.04 (88%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

  3. Shea – Bouchard2:50

    xG 0.24–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.5 xGSEA 1.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 37/100 · #29 of 52 this seasonSwing 1.26 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 83% of the time.

EDM winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).