Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Oct 7, 2026·Honda Center, Anaheim

Edmonton Oilers 5, Anaheim Ducks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 63% of the time.

ANA winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM0651102519
ANA21605010231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:11ANABeckett SenneckePPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Leo Carlsson · Snap, 0.25 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:28ANABeckett SenneckePPAssists: Leo Carlsson, Jackson LaCombe · Tip-in, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P2 0:11EDMEvan BouchardAssists: Leon Draisaitl · Slap, 0.01 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:30EDMKasperi KapanenPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Evan Bouchard · Snap, 0.15 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:12EDMEvan BouchardGWGAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Connor McDavid · Slap, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P2 16:49EDMVasily PodkolzinAssists: Leon Draisaitl · Snap, 0.22 xG4–2
  7. P2 19:08EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Mattias Ekholm · Snap, 0.06 xG5–2
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:08EDMJosh Samanski: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:27ANACutter Gauthier: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P1 14:43EDMJake Walman: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P1 16:58ANALeo Carlsson: Interference2 min
  5. P2 3:39EDMConnor Murphy: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 4:55ANAJudd Caulfield: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  7. P2 6:55EDMConnor Murphy: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P2 18:48EDMConnor Murphy: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 18:48ANABeckett Sennecke: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 3:28EDMJosh Samanski: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 14:26ANANikita Nesterenko: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 16:25EDMIsaac Howard: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 17:10EDMConnor Murphy: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win53% to win
← EDM attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Carlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMANA
19Shots on goal31
2.5Expected goals3.3
43Shot attempts74
38Faceoffs won27
4Power plays7
16Penalty minutes10
28Hits29
18Blocked shots9
15Giveaways15
2Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestDraisaitl – McDavid – Podkolzin10:32

    xG 1.02–0.27 (79%)attempts 15–10goals 3–0

  2. Dickinson – Kapanen – Frederic5:27

    xG 0.29–0.20 (59%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  3. Joseph – Formenton – Michaels7:18

    xG 0.16–0.36 (31%)attempts 2–10goals 0–0

  4. Jones – Howard – Samanski5:31

    xG 0.00–0.25 (0%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard9:09

    xG 0.96–0.36 (73%)attempts 12–10goals 3–0

  2. Ekholm – Murphy2:45

    xG 0.06–0.03 (66%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Shea – Bouchard2:50

    xG 0.00–0.03 (7%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Granlund – Sennecke3:16

    xG 0.48–0.07 (87%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Poehling – Nesterenko – Klepov4:31

    xG 0.15–0.04 (77%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Granlund – Sennecke – Klepov2:15

    xG 0.08–0.11 (42%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Gauthier – Carlsson – Sennecke3:45

    xG 0.18–0.22 (45%)attempts 6–1goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLuneau – Mintyukov4:32

    xG 0.60–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0

  2. Hinds – Warren8:20

    xG 0.54–0.04 (92%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  3. Mintyukov – Mitchell8:56

    xG 0.60–0.52 (53%)attempts 16–7goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.3 xGEDM 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #22 of 65 this seasonSwing 1.44 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 63% of the time.

ANA winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).