Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
51
Shoots
Right
Height
196 cm
Weight
100 kg
Born
Collingwood, CAN
Draft
1993, round 1, #7 (EDM)

Career · 2009–10 to 2011–12

Games
208
Goals
53
Points
111
TOI per game
15:59
xGF% (5v5)
53.8%
Goals above expected
+1.1

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10NSH63192746018:422168.8%1720.9–
2010–11NJD62131124−915:271399.4%512.951.5%
2010–11WSH11437+315:533013.3%32.555.1%
2010–11All teams73171431−615:3116910.1%815.452.1%
2011–12STL72171734+1314:0514212.0%1315.555.6%
Total4 teams2085358111+715:5952710.1%3851.953.8%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.811.250100150200
12m14m16m18m20m50100150200Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2011–12 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd line

77th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

1st line
  • Goals /600.9679th pct
  • Assists /601.0561st pct
  • ixG /600.9481st pct
  • Goals above expected+1.165th pct

Play-driving

2nd line
  • xGF% (5v5)53.8%84th pct
  • CF% (5v5)53.6%85th pct
  • Relative xGF%+1.667th pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.1127th pct

Usage

2nd line
  • TOI per game15:5965th pct
  • PP time share43.7%73rd pct
  • Offensive zone starts70.4%94th pct
  • Quality of competition23.9%39th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Arnott wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2011–12, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 610+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

49.7%

1362–1379 · #100 of 179 regulars, 44th percentile

Against an average centre

50.1%

Opponents won 50.4% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.6% against them.

Wins above average

+3

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

13.2

2,741 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

50%484 · +0.648%424 · +1.848%717 · +1.652%124 · +1.950%145 · +0.244%104 · +1.144%102 · +1.253%225 · +0.755%416 · +0.6Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone48.2% 552–594
  • Neutral zone49.0% 470–489
  • Defensive zone53.5% 340–296

By strength

  • Even strength49.5% 1130–1152
  • Power play50.5% 202–198
  • Shorthanded41.4% 12–17

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +19 after a win, −3 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.1 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–10107848.8%49.5%
2010–1189450.2%50.3%
2011–1276950.3%50.8%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+1.1 goals above expected

010203040506050100150200Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60+80