Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #32

Michal Rozsival

Age
48
Shoots
Right
Height
185 cm
Weight
95 kg
Born
Vlasim, CZE
Draft
1996, round 4, #105 (PIT)

Career · 2009–10 to 2016–17

Games
408
Goals
14
Points
106
TOI per game
18:41
xGF% (5v5)
51.9%
Goals above expected
−2.9

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10NYR8232023+321:26803.8%44.6–
2010–11NYR3231215+322:032412.5%62.154.6%
2010–11PHX33336+319:59319.7%21.451.4%
2010–11All teams6561521+621:005510.9%83.553.2%
2011–12PHX5411213+819:20492.0%01.951.7%
2012–13CHI2701212+1818:07130.0%00.960.0%
2013–14CHI42178+716:39392.6%01.458.5%
2014–15CHI6511213017:01561.8%02.348.1%
2015–16CHI5111213+316:10412.4%21.747.2%
2016–17CHI22123−315:30166.3%00.746.6%
Total3 teams4081492106+4218:413494.0%1416.951.9%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.8150100150200250300350400
15m20m25m50100150200250300350400Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2016–17 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd pair

64th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

3rd pair
  • Goals /600.1128th pct
  • Assists /600.7270th pct
  • ixG /600.1326th pct
  • Shots /602.7515th pct

Play-driving

1st pair
  • xGF% (5v5)51.9%79th pct
  • CF% (5v5)53.2%91st pct
  • Relative xGF%+1.070th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.2456th pct

Usage

2nd pair
  • TOI per game18:4157th pct
  • PP time share14.0%51st pct
  • PK time share23.1%42nd pct
  • Quality of competition24.0%42nd pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−2.9 goals above expected

05101550100150200250300350400Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−20−100+10+20+30+40+50