- Age
- 49
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 183 cm
- Weight
- 91 kg
- Born
- Seria, BHR
- Draft
- 1996, round 9, #223 (HFD)
Career · 2009–10 to 2014–15
- Games
- 445
- Goals
- 18
- Points
- 70
- TOI per game
- 11:21
- xGF% (5v5)
- 46.9%
- Goals above expected
- −17.1
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2014–15 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
Extra / AHL
6th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.214th pct
- Assists /600.6225th pct
- ixG /600.427th pct
- Goals above expected−17.13rd pct
Play-driving
4th line- xGF% (5v5)46.9%29th pct
- CF% (5v5)46.0%20th pct
- Relative xGF%−6.212th pct
- Penalty diff /600.0141st pct
Usage
Extra / AHL- TOI per game11:2124th pct
- PP time share0.4%1st pct
- Offensive zone starts30.7%4th pct
- Quality of competition23.2%20th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often Adams wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2014–15, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1134+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
44.0%
699–891 · #172 of 184 regulars, 7th percentile
Against an average centre
44.3%
Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.
Wins above average
−91
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
4.9
1,590 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone45.6% 159–190
- Neutral zone43.0% 221–293
- Defensive zone43.9% 319–408
By strength
- Even strength46.1% 473–553
- Power play43.8% 7–9
- Shorthanded40.3% 216–320
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +6 after a win, −21 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.5 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Eric Staal42.1% 16–22
- John Tavares45.9% 17–20
- Claude Giroux40.5% 15–22
- Vincent Lecavalier54.8% 17–14
- Jason Spezza29.6% 8–19
- Brian Boyle41.7% 10–14
- Nicklas Backstrom34.8% 8–15
- Jeff Carter38.1% 8–13
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 556 | 43.9% | 43.9% |
| 2010–11 | 465 | 41.7% | 42.2% |
| 2011–12 | 292 | 45.2% | 45.5% |
| 2012–13 | 98 | 52.0% | 52.6% |
| 2013–14 | 139 | 43.9% | 44.2% |
| 2014–15 | 40 | 42.5% | 44.1% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−17.1 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games