Defence · #77
Joe Corvo
- Age
- 49
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 183 cm
- Weight
- 93 kg
- Born
- Oak Park, USA
- Draft
- 1997, round 4, #83 (LAK)
Career · 2009–10 to 2013–14
- Games
- 274
- Goals
- 30
- Points
- 110
- TOI per game
- 21:19
- xGF% (5v5)
- 48.7%
- Goals above expected
- +3.5
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
| 2009–10 |   CAR | 34 | 4 | 8 | 12 | −6 | 25:13 | 76 | 5.3% | 6 | 4.3 | – |
| 2009–10 |   WSH | 18 | 2 | 4 | 6 | −4 | 19:41 | 23 | 8.7% | 3 | 1.3 | – |
| 2009–10 | All teams | 52 | 6 | 12 | 18 | −10 | 23:18 | 99 | 6.1% | 9 | 5.5 | – |
| 2010–11 | CAR | 82 | 11 | 29 | 40 | −14 | 24:47 | 191 | 5.8% | 23 | 8.4 | 46.1% |
| 2011–12 |   BOS | 75 | 4 | 21 | 25 | +10 | 18:49 | 168 | 2.4% | 9 | 7.0 | 53.2% |
| 2012–13 | CAR | 40 | 6 | 11 | 17 | −3 | 18:46 | 71 | 8.5% | 8 | 3.8 | 47.7% |
| 2013–14 |   OTT | 25 | 3 | 7 | 10 | −7 | 17:31 | 54 | 5.6% | 2 | 1.8 | 47.6% |
| Total | 4 teams | 274 | 30 | 80 | 110 | −24 | 21:19 | 583 | 5.1% | 51 | 26.5 | 48.7% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2013–14 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
2nd pair
65th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.
- 1st pair
- 2nd pair
- 3rd pair
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
1st pair- Goals /600.3185th pct
- Assists /600.8277th pct
- ixG /600.2787th pct
- Shots /605.9993rd pct
Play-driving
3rd pair- xGF% (5v5)48.7%40th pct
- CF% (5v5)51.5%74th pct
- Relative xGF%−2.328th pct
- xGA /60 (lower is better)2.689th pct
Usage
2nd pair- TOI per game21:1978th pct
- PP time share49.2%86th pct
- PK time share23.9%40th pct
- Quality of competition24.4%60th pct
Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
+3.5 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games