Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #12

Todd White

Atlanta Thrashers New York Rangers(traded during the season)
Age
51
Shoots
Left
Height
178 cm
Weight
90 kg
Born
Kanata, CAN
Draft
Undrafted

Career · 2009–10 to 2010–11

Games
83
Goals
8
Points
28
TOI per game
13:36
xGF% (5v5)
36.4%
Goals above expected
−3.6

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10ATL6571926−1115:15927.6%1010.2–
2010–11NYR18112−27:41119.1%01.436.4%
Total2 teams8382028−1313:361037.8%1011.636.4%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.81020304050607080
6m8m10m12m14m16m18m1020304050607080Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2010–11 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

Extra / AHL

8th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

4th line
  • Goals /600.4315th pct
  • Assists /601.0656th pct
  • ixG /600.6228th pct
  • Goals above expected−3.622nd pct

Play-driving

Extra / AHL
  • xGF% (5v5)36.4%3rd pct
  • CF% (5v5)37.0%0th pct
  • Relative xGF%−14.91st pct
  • Penalty diff /600.0038th pct

Usage

4th line
  • TOI per game13:3637th pct
  • PP time share6.9%30th pct
  • Offensive zone starts58.2%52nd pct
  • Quality of competition22.4%2nd pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how). This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.

Most similar players this season

Needs a regular role to compare.

Faceoffs

How often White wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2010–11, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 405+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

53.8%

430–369 · #36 of 179 regulars, 80th percentile

Against an average centre

53.9%

Opponents won 50.1% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.9% against them.

Wins above average

+31

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

10.1

799 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

51%140 · +0.261%168 · 0.044%100 · +2.658%36 · +2.040%35 · +1.160%35 · 0.057%28 · +2.456%165 · +2.150%92 · +3.5Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone53.7% 139–120
  • Neutral zone52.6% 144–130
  • Defensive zone55.3% 147–119

By strength

  • Even strength53.4% 323–282
  • Power play60.2% 77–51
  • Shorthanded45.2% 28–34

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +11 after a win, −15 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.5 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–1074353.8%53.9%
2010–115653.6%53.3%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−3.6 goals above expected

0246810121020304050607080Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−20−100+10+20+30+40