Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #22

Dan Boyle

San Jose Sharks New York Rangers(traded during the season)
Age
50
Shoots
Right
Height
180 cm
Weight
88 kg
Born
Ottawa, CAN
Draft
Undrafted

Career · 2009–10 to 2015–16

Games
354
Goals
52
Points
212
TOI per game
24:35
xGF% (5v5)
56.0%
Goals above expected
−7.8

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10SJS76154358+626:131808.3%2813.4–
2010–11SJS7694150+226:141994.5%2714.556.5%
2011–12SJS8193948+1025:352523.6%1714.252.4%
2012–13SJS4671320+322:48977.2%138.561.4%
2013–14SJS75122436−821:171547.8%189.256.0%
2014–15NYR6591120+1820:151167.8%88.454.2%
2015–16NYR74101424018:499510.5%108.448.8%
Total2 teams49371185256+3123:091,0936.5%12176.654.5%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.811.250100150200250300350
20m22m24m26m28m30m50100150200250300350Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2015–16 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

1st pair

98th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

1st pair
  • Goals /600.3793rd pct
  • Assists /600.9788th pct
  • ixG /600.4099th pct
  • Shots /605.7591st pct

Play-driving

1st pair
  • xGF% (5v5)54.5%94th pct
  • CF% (5v5)52.5%84th pct
  • Relative xGF%+2.887th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.1372nd pct

Usage

1st pair
  • TOI per game23:0993rd pct
  • PP time share64.4%97th pct
  • PK time share24.0%44th pct
  • Quality of competition24.7%79th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−7.8 goals above expected

010203040506050100150200250300350Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−100+10+20+30+40