Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #17

Brad Stuart

Age
46
Shoots
Left
Height
188 cm
Weight
98 kg
Born
Rocky Mountain House, CAN
Draft
1998, round 1, #3 (SJS)

Career · 2009–10 to 2015–16

Games
410
Goals
19
Points
91
TOI per game
20:59
xGF% (5v5)
50.6%
Goals above expected
−4.8

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10DET8241620−1223:101532.6%38.2–
2010–11DET6731720+421:32813.7%23.552.6%
2011–12DET8161521+1621:03966.3%14.452.0%
2012–13SJS48066+420:27390.0%02.152.6%
2013–14SJS613811+419:10644.7%02.453.0%
2014–15COL6531013−420:21644.7%13.142.5%
2015–16COL6000−214:000–00.145.7%
Total3 teams410197291+1020:594973.8%723.850.6%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.850100150200250300350400
14m16m18m20m22m24m26m28m50100150200250300350400Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2015–16 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd pair

53rd percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

3rd pair
  • Goals /600.1337th pct
  • Assists /600.5036th pct
  • ixG /600.1745th pct
  • Shots /603.4741st pct

Play-driving

2nd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)50.6%64th pct
  • CF% (5v5)48.5%37th pct
  • Relative xGF%−1.637th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.2259th pct

Usage

1st pair
  • TOI per game20:5978th pct
  • PP time share5.8%35th pct
  • PK time share53.0%96th pct
  • Quality of competition25.0%91st pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−4.8 goals above expected

051015202550100150200250300350400Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−100+10+20+30+40