Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #16

Jamie Lundmark

Calgary Flames Toronto Maple Leafs(traded during the season)
Age
45
Shoots
Right
Height
183 cm
Weight
89 kg
Born
Edmonton, CAN
Draft
1999, round 1, #9 (NYR)

2009–10

Games
36
Goals
5
Points
12
TOI per game
13:47
xGF% (5v5)
–
Goals above expected
−1.4

Season

The regular-season line, by team for traded players.

2009–10CGY21459−615:223611.1%25.0–
2009–10TOR15123−111:34166.3%01.3–
2009–10All teams365712−713:47529.6%26.4–

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.40.5101520253035
10m12m14m16m18m101520253035Game

Player card

How this season compares with everyone else at the position, and the players with the most similar profile.

Scoring

  • Goals /600.60
  • Assists /600.85
  • ixG /600.77
  • Goals above expected−1.4

Play-driving

  • xGF% (5v5)–
  • CF% (5v5)–
  • Relative xGF%–
  • Penalty diff /60-0.60

Usage

  • TOI per game13:47
  • PP time share–
  • Offensive zone starts–
  • Quality of competition–

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.

Most similar players this season

Needs a regular role to compare.

Faceoffs

How often Lundmark wins the draw this season, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 202+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

48.9%

45–47 · below the 202 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

49.7%

Opponents won 50.8% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.2% against them.

Wins above average

0

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

3.1

92 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

67%3 · +5.167%6 · −3.446%46 · +1.333%6 · +0.60%1 · –80%5 · +0.450%2 · +2.148%23 · +1.9Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone48.1% 25–27
  • Neutral zone53.3% 8–7
  • Defensive zone48.0% 12–13

By strength

  • Even strength46.7% 35–40
  • Power play56.3% 9–7

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +11 after a win, −23 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.2 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−1.4 goals above expected

02465101520253035Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−100+10+20+30