Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #44

Brooks Orpik

Age
46
Shoots
Left
Height
191 cm
Weight
98 kg
Born
San Francisco, USA
Draft
2000, round 1, #18 (PIT)

Career · 2009–10 to 2018–19

Games
659
Goals
12
Points
139
TOI per game
20:11
xGF% (5v5)
49.5%
Goals above expected
−5.2

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10PIT7322325+620:06613.3%12.6–
2010–11PIT6311213+1220:53561.8%01.748.1%
2011–12PIT7321618+1922:33444.5%01.653.7%
2012–13PIT46088+1722:17320.0%00.849.3%
2013–14PIT7221113−321:12504.0%01.647.0%
2014–15WSH7801919+521:48660.0%02.051.0%
2015–16WSH413710+1119:49319.7%01.155.0%
2016–17WSH7901414+3217:47930.0%02.652.2%
2017–18WSH8101010−919:22540.0%01.941.8%
2018–19WSH53279+815:40434.7%01.349.7%
Total2 teams65912127139+9820:115302.3%117.249.5%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.40.50.6100200300400500600
14m16m18m20m22m24m100200300400500600Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2018–19 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd pair

31st percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

Extra / AHL
  • Goals /600.0511th pct
  • Assists /600.5746th pct
  • ixG /600.083rd pct
  • Shots /602.397th pct

Play-driving

3rd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)49.5%52nd pct
  • CF% (5v5)49.0%44th pct
  • Relative xGF%−2.129th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.3249th pct

Usage

2nd pair
  • TOI per game20:1172nd pct
  • PP time share1.5%16th pct
  • PK time share53.1%96th pct
  • Quality of competition24.7%78th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−5.2 goals above expected

05101520100200300400500600Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60