Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #7

Paul Martin

Age
45
Shoots
Left
Height
185 cm
Weight
91 kg
Born
Minneapolis, USA
Draft
2000, round 2, #62 (NJD)

Career · 2009–10 to 2017–18

Games
22
Goals
2
Points
11
TOI per game
22:30
xGF% (5v5)
–
Goals above expected
+0.3

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10NJD222911+1022:30219.5%21.7–
2010–11PIT7732124+923:221042.9%106.052.9%
2011–12PIT7322527+923:00932.2%44.555.4%
2012–13PIT3461723+1425:203815.8%92.754.5%
2013–14PIT3931215−424:34545.6%93.551.0%
2014–15PIT7431720+1722:47614.9%13.753.5%
2015–16SJS7831720+1320:44496.1%22.354.3%
2016–17SJS8142226+1019:14577.0%01.750.9%
2017–18SJS14022+314:4660.0%00.253.1%
Total3 teams49226142168+8122:044835.4%3726.453.2%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.810121416182022
21m22m22m23m23m24m10121416182022Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2017–18 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

1st pair

81st percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

3rd pair
  • Goals /600.1441st pct
  • Assists /600.7874th pct
  • ixG /600.1531st pct
  • Shots /602.6713th pct

Play-driving

1st pair
  • xGF% (5v5)53.2%87th pct
  • CF% (5v5)52.7%88th pct
  • Relative xGF%0.057th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.1968th pct

Usage

1st pair
  • TOI per game22:0488th pct
  • PP time share29.0%71st pct
  • PK time share45.0%86th pct
  • Quality of competition24.9%89th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+0.3 goals above expected

00.511.525101520Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−20−100+10+20+30+40+50+60