Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #26

John-Michael Liles

Age
45
Shoots
Left
Height
178 cm
Weight
84 kg
Born
Indianapolis, USA
Draft
2000, round 5, #159 (COL)

Career · 2009–10 to 2016–17

Games
448
Goals
31
Points
172
TOI per game
19:52
xGF% (5v5)
50.8%
Goals above expected
−6.9

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10COL5962531−218:28966.3%204.8–
2010–11COL7664046−922:011633.7%188.950.7%
2011–12TOR6672027−1421:211066.6%136.648.9%
2012–13TOR322911−118:46474.3%12.445.2%
2013–14TOR6000−217:0450.0%00.138.6%
2013–14CAR35279+720:06513.9%42.354.0%
2013–14All teams41279+519:39563.6%42.551.8%
2014–15CAR5722022−919:09902.2%75.154.6%
2015–16CAR646915−320:34926.5%35.052.0%
2015–16BOS17066−719:19190.0%00.746.2%
2015–16All teams8161521−1020:181115.4%35.750.8%
2016–17BOS36055+116:12360.0%31.954.1%
Total4 teams44831141172−3919:527054.4%6937.950.8%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.811.2100200300400
14m16m18m20m22m24m100200300400Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2016–17 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

1st pair

82nd percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

1st pair
  • Goals /600.2166th pct
  • Assists /600.9587th pct
  • ixG /600.2683rd pct
  • Shots /604.7574th pct

Play-driving

2nd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)50.8%66th pct
  • CF% (5v5)50.2%60th pct
  • Relative xGF%+2.080th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.2259th pct

Usage

2nd pair
  • TOI per game19:5267th pct
  • PP time share45.6%86th pct
  • PK time share17.5%32nd pct
  • Quality of competition24.1%48th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−6.9 goals above expected

010203040100200300400Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−20−100+10+20+30+40+50