Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #5

Dan Hamhuis

Age
43
Shoots
Left
Height
185 cm
Weight
93 kg
Born
Smithers, CAN
Draft
2001, round 1, #12 (NSH)

Career · 2009–10 to 2019–20

Games
159
Goals
4
Points
40
TOI per game
19:47
xGF% (5v5)
50.9%
Goals above expected
−2.8

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10NSH7851924+421:151154.3%14.9–
2010–11VAN6461723+2922:411095.5%74.650.3%
2011–12VAN8243337+2923:261402.9%116.251.7%
2012–13VAN4742024+923:23616.6%64.252.2%
2013–14VAN7951722+1323:571503.3%36.350.8%
2014–15VAN5912223021:32821.2%33.647.1%
2015–16VAN5831013−221:25724.2%33.149.5%
2016–17DAL7911516−719:22831.2%13.750.5%
2017–18DAL8032124−620:11664.5%23.151.4%
2018–19NSH57055−216:03390.0%01.548.3%
2019–20NSH60088+614:31440.0%02.050.2%
Total3 teams74332187219+7320:499613.3%3743.350.3%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.40.50.620406080100120140
17m18m19m20m21m22m23m20406080100120140Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2019–20 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

1st pair

78th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

3rd pair
  • Goals /600.1232nd pct
  • Assists /600.7369th pct
  • ixG /600.1741st pct
  • Shots /603.7343rd pct

Play-driving

1st pair
  • xGF% (5v5)50.3%62nd pct
  • CF% (5v5)52.0%84th pct
  • Relative xGF%+0.967th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.2270th pct

Usage

1st pair
  • TOI per game20:4980th pct
  • PP time share23.8%67th pct
  • PK time share47.1%90th pct
  • Quality of competition24.7%76th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−2.8 goals above expected

0246820406080100120140Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60