Defence · #45

Aaron Johnson

Calgary Flames

Edmonton Oilers

Columbus Blue Jackets

Boston Bruins(traded during the season)

Age: 43
Shoots: Left
Height: 185 cm
Weight: 93 kg
Born: Port Hawkesbury, CAN
Draft: 2001, round 3, #85 (CBJ)

Career · 3 seasons

Games: 107
Goals: 7
Points: 26
TOI per game: 16:02
xGF% (5v5): 51.3%
Goals above expected: +2.0

ShowAll teams Calgary Flames Edmonton Oilers Columbus Blue Jackets Boston Bruins

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.


2009–10	CGY	22	1	2	3	0	12:11	13	7.7%	0	0.6	–
2009–10	EDM	19	3	4	7	−6	19:40	23	13.0%	3	1.1	–
2009–10	All teams	41	4	6	10	−6	15:39	36	11.1%	3	1.7	–
After a break: 2011–12	CBJ	56	3	13	16	−12	16:30	63	4.8%	2	3.0	50.6%
2012–13	BOS	10	0	0	0	0	14:52	8	0.0%	0	0.3	55.4%
Total	4 teams	107	7	19	26	−18	16:02	107	6.5%	5	5.0	51.3%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)

Player card

Model-based

How 3 seasons compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd pair

56th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

1st pair
2nd pair
3rd pair
Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd pair

Goals /600.2471st pct
Assists /600.6655th pct
ixG /600.1748th pct
Shots /603.7452nd pct

Play-driving

2nd pair

xGF% (5v5)51.3%68th pct
CF% (5v5)49.4%47th pct
Relative xGF%+2.073rd pct
xGA /60 (lower is better)2.2852nd pct

Usage

3rd pair

TOI per game16:0219th pct
PP time share11.8%41st pct
PK time share24.8%43rd pct
Quality of competition24.1%36th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Most similar players this season

Finishing

Model-based

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+2.0 goals above expected

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games