Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #37

Denis Grebeshkov

Edmonton Oilers Nashville Predators(traded during the season)
Age
42
Shoots
Left
Height
183 cm
Weight
93 kg
Born
Yaroslavl, RUS
Draft
2002, round 1, #18 (LAK)

Career · 2 seasons

Games
58
Goals
7
Points
22
TOI per game
20:28
xGF% (5v5)
49.1%
Goals above expected
+3.7

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10EDM4761319−1621:494314.0%82.8–
2009–10NSH4112016:28425.0%00.5–
2009–10All teams5171421−1621:244714.9%83.3–
After a break: 2013–14EDM7011013:4130.0%00.049.1%
Total2 teams5871522−1620:285014.0%83.349.1%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.81020304050
14m16m18m20m22m24m1020304050Game

Player card

How 2 seasons compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd pair

61st percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd pair
  • Goals /600.3587th pct
  • Assists /600.7658th pct
  • ixG /600.1745th pct
  • Shots /602.539th pct

Play-driving

2nd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)49.1%44th pct
  • CF% (5v5)52.3%76th pct
  • Relative xGF%−0.154th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)1.9783rd pct

Usage

3rd pair
  • TOI per game20:2862nd pct
  • PP time share9.7%40th pct
  • PK time share0.8%0th pct
  • Quality of competition24.6%66th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how). This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.

Most similar players this season

Needs a regular role to compare.

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+3.7 goals above expected

024681020304050Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−10−50+5+10+15