Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #52

Jonathan Ericsson

Age
42
Shoots
Left
Height
193 cm
Weight
99 kg
Born
Karlskrona, SWE
Draft
2002, round 9, #291 (DET)

Career · 2009–10 to 2019–20

Games
653
Goals
25
Points
120
TOI per game
18:42
xGF% (5v5)
48.8%
Goals above expected
−0.2

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10DET624913−1516:42557.3%02.8–
2010–11DET7431215+818:50893.4%13.251.6%
2011–12DET6911011+1617:05631.6%02.653.2%
2012–13DET4531013+621:19348.8%01.654.4%
2013–14DET4811011+221:15661.5%01.950.8%
2014–15DET8231215−519:35823.7%03.248.7%
2015–16DET7131215+218:32684.4%02.648.8%
2016–17DET51189−219:13432.3%01.946.3%
2017–18DET8131013−719:19863.5%03.148.4%
2018–19DET52325−1017:13486.3%01.838.7%
2019–20DET18000−1214:15160.0%00.437.1%
Total1 team6532595120−1718:426503.8%125.248.8%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.8100200300400500600
12m14m16m18m20m22m24m100200300400500600Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2019–20 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd pair

37th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

3rd pair
  • Goals /600.1232nd pct
  • Assists /600.4725th pct
  • ixG /600.1218th pct
  • Shots /603.2026th pct

Play-driving

3rd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)48.8%44th pct
  • CF% (5v5)50.2%62nd pct
  • Relative xGF%−2.029th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.3547th pct

Usage

2nd pair
  • TOI per game18:4261st pct
  • PP time share2.8%26th pct
  • PK time share43.4%84th pct
  • Quality of competition24.7%80th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−0.2 goals above expected

0510152025100200300400500600Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60