Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #3

Clayton Stoner

Minnesota Wild Anaheim Ducks(traded during the season)
Age
41
Shoots
Left
Height
193 cm
Weight
98 kg
Born
Port McNeill, CAN
Draft
2004, round 3, #79 (MIN)

Career · 2009–10 to 2016–17

Games
361
Goals
7
Points
48
TOI per game
16:22
xGF% (5v5)
50.2%
Goals above expected
−3.2

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10MIN8022+113:1950.0%00.1–
2010–11MIN57279+516:52405.0%01.246.5%
2011–12MIN52145+317:15472.1%01.850.6%
2012–13MIN4801010018:13400.0%01.247.5%
2013–14MIN63145−613:20482.1%01.346.2%
2014–15ANA69178−217:39681.5%02.354.9%
2015–16ANA50156+415:22323.1%01.653.3%
2016–17ANA14123017:33166.3%00.753.1%
Total2 teams36174148+516:222962.4%010.250.2%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.40.50.650100150200250300350
10m12m14m16m18m20m22m50100150200250300350Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2016–17 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd pair

36th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

Extra / AHL
  • Goals /600.0714th pct
  • Assists /600.4220th pct
  • ixG /600.109th pct
  • Shots /603.0123rd pct

Play-driving

2nd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)50.2%59th pct
  • CF% (5v5)47.7%26th pct
  • Relative xGF%0.058th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)1.9692nd pct

Usage

3rd pair
  • TOI per game16:2231st pct
  • PP time share2.1%18th pct
  • PK time share31.4%59th pct
  • Quality of competition24.0%44th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−3.2 goals above expected

024681050100150200250300350Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−20−100+10+20+30+40+50