Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #26

Danny Syvret

Philadelphia Flyers Anaheim Ducks(traded during the season)
Age
41
Shoots
Left
Height
183 cm
Weight
93 kg
Born
Millgrove, CAN
Draft
2005, round 3, #81 (EDM)

Career · 2009–10 to 2010–11

Games
31
Goals
3
Points
6
TOI per game
13:19
xGF% (5v5)
54.3%
Goals above expected
+1.6

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10PHI21224+112:291414.3%00.7–
2010–11ANA6112−316:27812.5%10.641.1%
2010–11PHI4000012:5830.0%00.177.4%
2010–11All teams10112−315:03119.1%10.854.3%
Total2 teams31336−213:192512.0%11.454.3%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.050.10.150.20.250.30.351015202530
11m12m13m14m15m1015202530Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2010–11 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd pair

64th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd pair
  • Goals /600.4496th pct
  • Assists /600.4421st pct
  • ixG /600.2164th pct
  • Shots /603.6452nd pct

Play-driving

1st pair
  • xGF% (5v5)54.3%86th pct
  • CF% (5v5)55.9%97th pct
  • Relative xGF%+10.8100th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.5916th pct

Usage

Extra / AHL
  • TOI per game13:193rd pct
  • PP time share16.9%49th pct
  • PK time share1.2%1st pct
  • Quality of competition22.0%0th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how). This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.

Most similar players this season

Needs a regular role to compare.

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+1.6 goals above expected

012351015202530Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−10−50+5+10+15