- Age
- 42
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 185 cm
- Weight
- 94 kg
- Born
- Chatham, CAN
- Draft
- 2004, round 4, #111 (MIN)
Career · 2009–10 to 2013–14
- Games
- 288
- Goals
- 47
- Points
- 83
- TOI per game
- 12:56
- xGF% (5v5)
- 44.0%
- Goals above expected
- +1.2
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
| 2009–10 |   NSH | 41 | 7 | 4 | 11 | +3 | 10:43 | 53 | 13.2% | 3 | 8.1 | – |
| 2009–10 |   EDM | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | −3 | 10:21 | 9 | 11.1% | 0 | 1.2 | – |
| 2009–10 | All teams | 49 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 10:39 | 62 | 12.9% | 3 | 9.3 | – |
| 2010–11 | EDM | 81 | 18 | 7 | 25 | −5 | 13:50 | 126 | 14.3% | 4 | 14.0 | 41.5% |
| 2011–12 | EDM | 79 | 17 | 16 | 33 | −7 | 15:26 | 137 | 12.4% | 6 | 14.0 | 46.0% |
| 2012–13 | EDM | 27 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 12:59 | 38 | 5.3% | 0 | 3.4 | 44.4% |
| 2013–14 | EDM | 52 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 9:50 | 59 | 3.4% | 0 | 5.1 | 43.4% |
| Total | 2 teams | 288 | 47 | 36 | 83 | −12 | 12:56 | 422 | 11.1% | 13 | 45.8 | 44.0% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2013–14 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
3rd line
38th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
3rd line- Goals /600.7660th pct
- Assists /600.5820th pct
- ixG /600.7456th pct
- Goals above expected+1.267th pct
Play-driving
4th line- xGF% (5v5)44.0%12th pct
- CF% (5v5)43.7%8th pct
- Relative xGF%−0.648th pct
- Penalty diff /600.4885th pct
Usage
3rd line- TOI per game12:5639th pct
- PP time share12.7%41st pct
- Offensive zone starts44.2%20th pct
- Quality of competition23.9%41st pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often Jones wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2013–14, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 929+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
28.3%
17–43 · below the 929 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
29.8%
Opponents won 51.5% of their draws; an average centre would have won 48.5% against them.
Wins above average
−12
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
1.2
60 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone28.6% 6–15
- Neutral zone0.0% 0–10
- Defensive zone37.9% 11–18
By strength
- Even strength31.8% 14–30
- Power play0.0% 0–2
- Shorthanded23.1% 3–10
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: −18 after a win, −16 after a loss. Each win was worth -0.3 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- David Krejci0.0% 0–3
- Matt Cullen0.0% 0–3
- Jay McClement0.0% 0–2
- Ryan Kesler50.0% 1–1
- Brad Richards100.0% 2–0
- Michal Handzus0.0% 0–2
- Justin Abdelkader0.0% 0–2
- Henrik Sedin100.0% 2–0
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 1 | 0.0% | -2.5% |
| 2010–11 | 29 | 34.5% | 36.2% |
| 2011–12 | 15 | 20.0% | 21.0% |
| 2012–13 | 9 | 22.2% | 25.2% |
| 2013–14 | 6 | 33.3% | 33.6% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
+1.2 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games