- Age
- 40
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 185 cm
- Weight
- 90 kg
- Born
- Buffalo, USA
- Draft
- 2004, round 6, #176 (BUF)
Career · 2009–10 to 2014–15
- Games
- 250
- Goals
- 20
- Points
- 38
- TOI per game
- 10:45
- xGF% (5v5)
- 46.3%
- Goals above expected
- −2.9
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2014–15 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
4th line
22nd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.4523rd pct
- Assists /600.406th pct
- ixG /600.5119th pct
- Goals above expected−2.935th pct
Play-driving
3rd line- xGF% (5v5)46.3%26th pct
- CF% (5v5)44.7%13th pct
- Relative xGF%−0.649th pct
- Penalty diff /601.2799th pct
Usage
4th line- TOI per game10:4518th pct
- PP time share1.6%13th pct
- Offensive zone starts35.4%8th pct
- Quality of competition23.8%40th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often Kaleta wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2014–15, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1134+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
45.3%
24–29 · below the 1134 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
45.7%
Opponents won 50.4% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.6% against them.
Wins above average
−2
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
1.4
53 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone27.3% 3–8
- Neutral zone61.5% 8–5
- Defensive zone44.8% 13–16
By strength
- Even strength43.9% 18–23
- Shorthanded50.0% 6–6
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +4 after a win, −21 after a loss. Each win was worth 0.8 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Jordan Staal0.0% 0–2
- Mark Letestu50.0% 1–1
- Eric Staal50.0% 1–1
- Derick Brassard50.0% 1–1
- Claude Giroux0.0% 0–2
- David Backes50.0% 1–1
- David Desharnais50.0% 1–1
- Richard Park0.0% 0–1
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 2 | 0.0% | -0.0% |
| 2010–11 | 12 | 41.7% | 42.7% |
| 2011–12 | 19 | 52.6% | 52.3% |
| 2012–13 | 11 | 45.5% | 46.3% |
| 2013–14 | 1 | 100.0% | 102.6% |
| 2014–15 | 8 | 37.5% | 37.9% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−2.9 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games