Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #24

Grant Clitsome

Columbus Blue Jackets Winnipeg Jets(traded during the season)
Age
41
Shoots
Left
Height
180 cm
Weight
96 kg
Born
Gloucester, CAN
Draft
2004, round 9, #271 (CBJ)

Career · 2009–10 to 2014–15

Games
205
Goals
15
Points
71
TOI per game
18:17
xGF% (5v5)
47.4%
Goals above expected
+2.5

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10CBJ11123014:44714.3%00.3–
2010–11CBJ3141519+221:16508.0%102.749.4%
2011–12CBJ5141014−617:02745.4%52.944.0%
2011–12WPG12033−316:54130.0%00.542.1%
2011–12All teams6341317−917:00874.6%53.543.5%
2012–13WPG4441216+1018:50567.1%33.346.0%
2013–14WPG3221012−519:47424.8%21.948.6%
2014–15WPG24044+416:22220.0%00.854.9%
Total2 teams205155671+218:172645.7%2012.547.4%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.850100150200
12m14m16m18m20m22m24m50100150200Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2014–15 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd pair

48th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

1st pair
  • Goals /600.2473rd pct
  • Assists /600.9082nd pct
  • ixG /600.2060th pct
  • Shots /604.2367th pct

Play-driving

3rd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)47.4%28th pct
  • CF% (5v5)50.3%61st pct
  • Relative xGF%−2.922nd pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.4327th pct

Usage

2nd pair
  • TOI per game18:1749th pct
  • PP time share29.3%67th pct
  • PK time share23.9%42nd pct
  • Quality of competition23.9%36th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+2.5 goals above expected

05101550100150200Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−100+10+20+30