- Age
- 39
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 191 cm
- Weight
- 95 kg
- Born
- Nashua, USA
- Draft
- 2005, round 5, #155 (NJD)
Career · 2010–11 to 2016–17
- Games
- 389
- Goals
- 17
- Points
- 65
- TOI per game
- 18:10
- xGF% (5v5)
- 51.1%
- Goals above expected
- +1.2
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
| 2010–11 |   NJD | 57 | 4 | 10 | 14 | +10 | 17:50 | 77 | 5.2% | 4 | 2.7 | 51.5% |
| 2011–12 | NJD | 82 | 4 | 13 | 17 | −4 | 20:11 | 94 | 4.3% | 2 | 3.3 | 50.7% |
| 2012–13 | NJD | 31 | 1 | 5 | 6 | +6 | 18:06 | 34 | 2.9% | 0 | 1.0 | 62.5% |
| 2013–14 | NJD | 72 | 4 | 7 | 11 | −5 | 18:19 | 88 | 4.5% | 0 | 3.3 | 58.1% |
| 2014–15 |   EDM | 74 | 2 | 6 | 8 | −21 | 17:56 | 78 | 2.6% | 0 | 3.2 | 43.4% |
| 2015–16 | EDM | 69 | 2 | 5 | 7 | −6 | 16:43 | 61 | 3.3% | 0 | 2.1 | 47.5% |
| 2016–17 | EDM | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | +1 | 7:55 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.2 | 57.9% |
| Total | 2 teams | 389 | 17 | 48 | 65 | −19 | 18:10 | 436 | 3.9% | 6 | 15.8 | 51.1% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2010–11 to 2016–17 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
2nd pair
72nd percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.
- 1st pair
- 2nd pair
- 3rd pair
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
3rd pair- Goals /600.1444th pct
- Assists /600.4120th pct
- ixG /600.1327th pct
- Shots /603.7046th pct
Play-driving
1st pair- xGF% (5v5)51.1%70th pct
- CF% (5v5)51.4%76th pct
- Relative xGF%+0.666th pct
- xGA /60 (lower is better)1.9194th pct
Usage
2nd pair- TOI per game18:1054th pct
- PP time share10.3%43rd pct
- PK time share33.4%62nd pct
- Quality of competition24.9%86th pct
Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
+1.2 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games