- Age
- 38
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 180 cm
- Weight
- 82 kg
- Born
- Vancouver, CAN
- Draft
- 2007, round 1, #8 (BOS)
Career · 2009–10 to 2011–12
- Games
- 20
- Goals
- 0
- Points
- 4
- TOI per game
- 10:58
- xGF% (5v5)
- 52.3%
- Goals above expected
- −1.9
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2011–12 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
4th line
32nd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
4th line- Goals /600.000th pct
- Assists /601.0965th pct
- ixG /600.5115th pct
- Goals above expected−1.940th pct
Play-driving
2nd line- xGF% (5v5)52.3%73rd pct
- CF% (5v5)49.0%41st pct
- Relative xGF%−2.233rd pct
- Penalty diff /601.0998th pct
Usage
4th line- TOI per game10:5820th pct
- PP time share9.1%35th pct
- Offensive zone starts61.1%64th pct
- Quality of competition22.4%4th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how). This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.
Most similar players this season
Needs a regular role to compare.
Faceoffs
How often Hamill wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2011–12, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 610+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
41.2%
21–30 · below the 610 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
41.7%
Opponents won 50.6% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.4% against them.
Wins above average
−4
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
3.6
51 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone27.8% 5–13
- Neutral zone47.8% 11–12
- Defensive zone50.0% 5–5
By strength
- Even strength40.4% 19–28
- Power play33.3% 1–2
- Shorthanded100.0% 1–0
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: 0 after a win, −20 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.3 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Eric Belanger25.0% 1–3
- Brendan Morrison50.0% 2–2
- David Desharnais50.0% 2–2
- Jeff Halpern33.3% 1–2
- Darren Helm33.3% 1–2
- Max Talbot66.7% 2–1
- Matt Read66.7% 2–1
- Kyle Wellwood0.0% 0–2
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 4 | 25.0% | 30.0% |
| 2010–11 | 16 | 31.3% | 34.0% |
| 2011–12 | 31 | 48.4% | 47.3% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−1.9 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games