Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
40
Shoots
Left
Height
178 cm
Weight
86 kg
Born
Minnetonka, USA
Draft
Undrafted

Career · 2009–10 to 2014–15

Games
262
Goals
12
Points
64
TOI per game
17:19
xGF% (5v5)
46.7%
Goals above expected
−2.7

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10NYI6931821−520:42783.8%55.3–
2010–11NYI6441822−518:49814.9%14.847.7%
2011–12NSH55246+614:04513.9%02.244.8%
2012–13WSH23369+917:372810.7%01.250.7%
2013–14WSH13011−418:16120.0%00.544.7%
2014–15WSH35055+112:22200.0%00.644.0%
2014–15CAR3000−218:3640.0%00.243.5%
2014–15All teams38055−112:52240.0%00.844.0%
Total4 teams262125264017:192744.4%614.746.7%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.850100150200250
10m15m20m25m50100150200250Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2014–15 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

Extra / AHL

19th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd pair
  • Goals /600.1647th pct
  • Assists /600.6962nd pct
  • ixG /600.1958th pct
  • Shots /603.6247th pct

Play-driving

Extra / AHL
  • xGF% (5v5)46.7%21st pct
  • CF% (5v5)46.7%17th pct
  • Relative xGF%−1.834th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.668th pct

Usage

3rd pair
  • TOI per game17:1940th pct
  • PP time share6.4%35th pct
  • PK time share20.5%34th pct
  • Quality of competition23.9%34th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−2.7 goals above expected

05101550100150200250Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−100+10+20+30