Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
41
Shoots
Left
Height
185 cm
Weight
99 kg
Born
White Rock, CAN
Draft
Undrafted

Career · 2009–10 to 2018–19

Games
554
Goals
49
Points
160
TOI per game
20:08
xGF% (5v5)
50.2%
Goals above expected
+7.9

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10FLA39268+515:08248.3%11.4–
2010–11FLA7351318−222:181164.3%34.948.9%
2011–12FLA77161733+623:421689.5%128.050.8%
2012–13VAN478816+1821:41948.5%64.753.3%
2013–14VAN8172633−520:541813.9%158.648.5%
2014–15TBL7042630+2720:011113.6%115.056.1%
2015–16TBL725611−418:28995.1%04.050.3%
2016–17TBL70189−818:34961.0%03.847.0%
2017–18VGK8011−219:0470.0%00.239.8%
2018–19EDM17101+112:42166.3%10.646.5%
Total5 teams55449111160+3620:089125.4%4941.150.2%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.51100200300400500
10m15m20m25m100200300400500Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2018–19 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

1st pair

83rd percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd pair
  • Goals /600.2677th pct
  • Assists /600.6049th pct
  • ixG /600.2268th pct
  • Shots /604.9176th pct

Play-driving

2nd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)50.2%60th pct
  • CF% (5v5)50.6%68th pct
  • Relative xGF%−0.450th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.1084th pct

Usage

1st pair
  • TOI per game20:0872nd pct
  • PP time share28.8%72nd pct
  • PK time share41.1%78th pct
  • Quality of competition24.8%84th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+7.9 goals above expected

01020304050100200300400500Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60