Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #51

Jake Gardiner

Age
36
Shoots
Left
Height
188 cm
Weight
92 kg
Born
Minnetonka, USA
Draft
2008, round 1, #17 (ANA)

Career · 2011–12 to 2020–21

Games
551
Goals
45
Points
245
TOI per game
21:21
xGF% (5v5)
49.0%
Goals above expected
+1.4

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2011–12TOR7572330−221:35798.9%74.546.1%
2012–13TOR12044020:29120.0%20.741.8%
2013–14TOR80102131−321:051367.4%117.344.2%
2014–15TOR7942024−2320:581004.0%85.748.1%
2015–16TOR7972431−1520:371225.7%126.350.6%
2016–17TOR8293443+2421:321277.1%137.451.8%
2017–18TOR8254752+922:321333.8%157.550.6%
2018–19TOR6232730+1921:13783.8%54.252.1%
2019–20CAR6842024−2416:40874.6%83.552.9%
2020–21CAR26088−116:03230.0%31.053.9%
Total2 teams64549228277−1620:398975.5%8448.249.5%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.51100200300400500
18m20m22m24m26m100200300400500Game

Player card

How 2011–12 to 2020–21 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd pair

73rd percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd pair
  • Goals /600.2268th pct
  • Assists /601.0391st pct
  • ixG /600.2266th pct
  • Shots /604.0449th pct

Play-driving

2nd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)49.5%53rd pct
  • CF% (5v5)50.8%70th pct
  • Relative xGF%+1.475th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.5026th pct

Usage

2nd pair
  • TOI per game20:3980th pct
  • PP time share43.1%87th pct
  • PK time share8.9%19th pct
  • Quality of competition24.1%52nd pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+1.4 goals above expected

01020304050100200300400500Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60