Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #48

Colby Robak

Florida Panthers Anaheim Ducks(traded during the season)
Age
36
Shoots
Left
Height
191 cm
Weight
88 kg
Born
Dauphin, CAN
Draft
2008, round 2, #46 (FLA)

Career · 2011–12 to 2014–15

Games
47
Goals
0
Points
4
TOI per game
15:51
xGF% (5v5)
45.8%
Goals above expected
−2.2

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2011–12FLA3000+112:3410.0%00.032.2%
2012–13FLA16011−115:11150.0%01.050.3%
2013–14FLA16022−418:34150.0%00.642.6%
2014–15FLA7000−112:5860.0%00.552.4%
2014–15ANA5011+315:1520.0%00.140.4%
2014–15All teams12011+213:5580.0%00.647.3%
Total2 teams47044−215:51390.0%02.245.8%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.050.10.150.21015202530354045
13m14m15m16m17m18m19m1015202530354045Game

Player card

How 2011–12 to 2014–15 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

Extra / AHL

18th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

Extra / AHL
  • Goals /600.003rd pct
  • Assists /600.328th pct
  • ixG /600.1850th pct
  • Shots /603.1430th pct

Play-driving

3rd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)45.8%15th pct
  • CF% (5v5)49.5%50th pct
  • Relative xGF%+0.462nd pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.4230th pct

Usage

3rd pair
  • TOI per game15:5121st pct
  • PP time share12.6%47th pct
  • PK time share22.0%39th pct
  • Quality of competition23.5%15th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−2.2 goals above expected

00.511.5210203040Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−15−10−50+5+10+15+20+25