- Age
- 36
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 180 cm
- Weight
- 84 kg
- Born
- Brandon, CAN
- Draft
- 2008, round 5, #127 (CBJ)
Career · 2010–11 to 2020–21
- Games
- 567
- Goals
- 95
- Points
- 203
- TOI per game
- 14:05
- xGF% (5v5)
- 50.9%
- Goals above expected
- −0.3
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
| 2010–11 |   CBJ | 42 | 11 | 9 | 20 | +3 | 11:06 | 50 | 22.0% | 4 | 5.9 | 54.0% |
| 2011–12 | CBJ | 13 | 0 | 3 | 3 | −5 | 9:08 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.4 | 50.2% |
| 2012–13 | CBJ | 42 | 9 | 7 | 16 | −9 | 14:11 | 63 | 14.3% | 0 | 5.7 | 46.1% |
| 2013–14 | CBJ | 56 | 9 | 15 | 24 | −1 | 16:06 | 90 | 10.0% | 4 | 10.0 | 53.3% |
| 2014–15 | CBJ | 56 | 13 | 10 | 23 | +1 | 16:00 | 93 | 14.0% | 0 | 12.3 | 46.7% |
| 2015–16 | CBJ | 73 | 11 | 13 | 24 | +1 | 15:08 | 114 | 9.6% | 1 | 12.2 | 53.2% |
| 2016–17 | CBJ | 65 | 10 | 5 | 15 | −4 | 13:21 | 92 | 10.9% | 0 | 11.6 | 45.3% |
| 2017–18 | CBJ | 69 | 9 | 15 | 24 | −10 | 13:23 | 108 | 8.3% | 1 | 11.2 | 47.9% |
| 2018–19 |   COL | 82 | 11 | 15 | 26 | −10 | 14:12 | 141 | 7.8% | 2 | 13.7 | 53.9% |
| 2019–20 | COL | 50 | 12 | 13 | 25 | +13 | 14:05 | 89 | 13.5% | 0 | 9.4 | 56.1% |
| 2020–21 | COL | 19 | 0 | 3 | 3 | −2 | 13:05 | 26 | 0.0% | 0 | 3.0 | 60.9% |
| Total | 2 teams | 567 | 95 | 108 | 203 | −23 | 14:05 | 870 | 10.9% | 12 | 95.3 | 50.9% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2010–11 to 2020–21 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
2nd line
63rd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
2nd line- Goals /600.7159th pct
- Assists /600.8146th pct
- ixG /600.7257th pct
- Goals above expected−0.359th pct
Play-driving
2nd line- xGF% (5v5)50.9%70th pct
- CF% (5v5)49.8%56th pct
- Relative xGF%+0.464th pct
- Penalty diff /600.1558th pct
Usage
3rd line- TOI per game14:0560th pct
- PP time share8.7%38th pct
- Offensive zone starts41.8%18th pct
- Quality of competition24.3%62nd pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often Calvert wins the draw over 2010–11 to 2020–21, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 2054+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
39.7%
91–138 · below the 2054 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
39.9%
Opponents won 50.2% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.8% against them.
Wins above average
−23
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
1.4
229 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone36.5% 35–61
- Neutral zone38.9% 28–44
- Defensive zone45.9% 28–33
By strength
- Even strength35.4% 63–115
- Power play66.7% 6–3
- Shorthanded52.4% 22–20
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +7 after a win, −9 after a loss. Each win was worth 0.5 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- John Tavares20.0% 1–4
- Bryan Little80.0% 4–1
- Travis Zajac50.0% 2–2
- Mark Scheifele25.0% 1–3
- Paul Stastny25.0% 1–3
- Brian Boyle50.0% 2–2
- Sidney Crosby75.0% 3–1
- Sam Reinhart25.0% 1–3
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010–11 | 9 | 33.3% | 34.7% |
| 2012–13 | 6 | 33.3% | 34.4% |
| 2013–14 | 9 | 33.3% | 31.4% |
| 2014–15 | 10 | 60.0% | 60.8% |
| 2015–16 | 14 | 50.0% | 51.7% |
| 2016–17 | 16 | 12.5% | 13.6% |
| 2017–18 | 44 | 34.1% | 33.5% |
| 2018–19 | 94 | 43.6% | 43.3% |
| 2019–20 | 26 | 46.2% | 47.6% |
| 2020–21 | 1 | 0.0% | 4.9% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−0.3 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games