Centre · #57
Tommy Wingels
- Age
- 38
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 183 cm
- Weight
- 91 kg
- Born
- Evanston, USA
- Draft
- 2008, round 6, #177 (SJS)
Career · 2010–11 to 2017–18
- Games
- 448
- Goals
- 62
- Points
- 143
- TOI per game
- 13:38
- xGF% (5v5)
- 51.5%
- Goals above expected
- −12.8
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
| 2010–11 |   SJS | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 5:07 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.1 | 22.7% |
| 2011–12 | SJS | 33 | 3 | 6 | 9 | −1 | 13:45 | 71 | 4.2% | 1 | 6.3 | 55.3% |
| 2012–13 | SJS | 42 | 5 | 8 | 13 | −9 | 14:14 | 69 | 7.2% | 1 | 5.2 | 51.2% |
| 2013–14 | SJS | 77 | 16 | 22 | 38 | +11 | 16:07 | 163 | 9.8% | 5 | 17.4 | 56.9% |
| 2014–15 | SJS | 75 | 15 | 21 | 36 | −7 | 16:28 | 158 | 9.5% | 10 | 19.0 | 46.2% |
| 2015–16 | SJS | 68 | 7 | 11 | 18 | −10 | 13:38 | 111 | 6.3% | 3 | 10.7 | 51.4% |
| 2016–17 | SJS | 37 | 5 | 3 | 8 | −2 | 10:03 | 42 | 11.9% | 0 | 3.4 | 53.5% |
| 2016–17 |   OTT | 36 | 2 | 2 | 4 | −9 | 10:58 | 39 | 5.1% | 0 | 2.9 | 44.5% |
| 2016–17 | All teams | 73 | 7 | 5 | 12 | −11 | 10:30 | 81 | 8.6% | 0 | 6.3 | 49.1% |
| 2017–18 |   CHI | 57 | 7 | 5 | 12 | −10 | 11:21 | 67 | 10.4% | 1 | 7.7 | 50.2% |
| 2017–18 |   BOS | 18 | 2 | 3 | 5 | −1 | 11:55 | 19 | 10.5% | 0 | 2.1 | 56.3% |
| 2017–18 | All teams | 75 | 9 | 8 | 17 | −11 | 11:29 | 86 | 10.5% | 1 | 9.7 | 51.7% |
| Total | 4 teams | 448 | 62 | 81 | 143 | −39 | 13:38 | 740 | 8.4% | 21 | 74.8 | 51.5% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2010–11 to 2017–18 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
3rd line
53rd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
3rd line- Goals /600.6146th pct
- Assists /600.8044th pct
- ixG /600.7361st pct
- Goals above expected−12.87th pct
Play-driving
2nd line- xGF% (5v5)51.5%74th pct
- CF% (5v5)49.8%55th pct
- Relative xGF%−1.937th pct
- Penalty diff /600.5691st pct
Usage
3rd line- TOI per game13:3852nd pct
- PP time share13.5%45th pct
- Offensive zone starts52.7%40th pct
- Quality of competition24.1%54th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often Wingels wins the draw over 2010–11 to 2017–18, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1537+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
43.8%
462–592 · below the 1537 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
44.0%
Opponents won 50.2% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.8% against them.
Wins above average
−63
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
3.7
1,054 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone43.7% 162–209
- Neutral zone45.8% 149–176
- Defensive zone42.2% 151–207
By strength
- Even strength44.2% 385–486
- Power play43.2% 32–42
- Shorthanded41.3% 45–64
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +8 after a win, −14 after a loss. Each win was worth 0.9 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Sean Monahan33.3% 5–10
- Paul Stastny21.4% 3–11
- Matt Cullen28.6% 4–10
- Matt Duchene53.8% 7–6
- Valtteri Filppula46.2% 6–7
- Mika Zibanejad30.8% 4–9
- Eric Staal23.1% 3–10
- Ryan Johansen66.7% 8–4
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010–11 | 3 | 33.3% | 30.6% |
| 2011–12 | 17 | 41.2% | 41.2% |
| 2012–13 | 16 | 25.0% | 25.3% |
| 2013–14 | 56 | 35.7% | 36.1% |
| 2014–15 | 154 | 45.5% | 45.6% |
| 2015–16 | 93 | 40.9% | 41.5% |
| 2016–17 | 260 | 42.7% | 43.0% |
| 2017–18 | 455 | 46.4% | 46.3% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−12.8 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games