Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #22

Wade Megan

St. Louis Blues Detroit Red Wings(traded during the season)
Age
36
Shoots
Left
Height
185 cm
Weight
87 kg
Born
Canton, USA
Draft
2009, round 5, #138 (FLA)

Career · 2016–17 to 2018–19

Games
15
Goals
1
Points
2
TOI per game
8:06
xGF% (5v5)
45.4%
Goals above expected
−0.6

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2016–17STL3101+18:48616.7%00.563.7%
2017–18STL100008:2110.0%00.115.9%
2018–19DET11011−47:53160.0%01.142.4%
Total2 teams15112−38:06234.3%01.645.4%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.050.10.15101112131415
7m8m8m8m8m8m101112131415Game

Player card

How 2016–17 to 2018–19 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

4th line

21st percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

4th line
  • Goals /600.4925th pct
  • Assists /600.4913th pct
  • ixG /600.8166th pct
  • Goals above expected−0.653rd pct

Play-driving

3rd line
  • xGF% (5v5)45.4%19th pct
  • CF% (5v5)47.0%22nd pct
  • Relative xGF%−1.043rd pct
  • Penalty diff /600.4986th pct

Usage

Extra / AHL
  • TOI per game8:062nd pct
  • PP time share0.7%4th pct
  • Offensive zone starts42.9%21st pct
  • Quality of competition22.1%1st pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how). This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.

Most similar players this season

Needs a regular role to compare.

Faceoffs

How often Megan wins the draw over 2016–17 to 2018–19, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 605+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

52.5%

42–38 · below the 605 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

52.3%

Opponents won 49.8% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.2% against them.

Wins above average

+2

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

5.3

80 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

33%15 · 0.085%13 · +8.058%12 · +4.033%3 · −1.017%6 · +5.180%5 · −12.353%19 · +4.643%7 · 0.0Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone72.0% 18–7
  • Neutral zone37.9% 11–18
  • Defensive zone50.0% 13–13

By strength

  • Even strength52.6% 41–37
  • Shorthanded50.0% 1–1

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +33 after a win, −5 after a loss. Each win was worth 2.0 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2016–172748.1%49.1%
2017–18250.0%52.9%
2018–195154.9%54.0%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−0.6 goals above expected

00.511.52468101214Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−30−20−100+10+20+30+40+50