Skip to content
Ice Lab

Left wing · #24

Oscar Lindberg

Age
34
Shoots
Left
Height
185 cm
Weight
92 kg
Born
Skelleftea, SWE
Draft
2010, round 2, #57 (PHX)

Career · 2014–15 to 2018–19

Games
252
Goals
39
Points
79
TOI per game
11:47
xGF% (5v5)
49.3%
Goals above expected
+5.6

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2014–15NYR100008:1820.0%00.173.9%
2015–16NYR68131528+1212:1111411.4%311.349.2%
2016–17NYR6581220+210:50869.3%16.546.3%
2017–18VGK639211−1111:478111.1%07.152.0%
2018–19VGK354812+312:03666.1%16.354.4%
2018–19OTT20538+113:132520.0%02.242.3%
2018–19All teams5591120+412:28919.9%18.549.7%
Total3 teams252394079+711:4737410.4%533.449.3%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.850100150200250
8m9m10m11m12m13m14m15m50100150200250Game

Player card

How 2014–15 to 2018–19 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd line

46th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd line
  • Goals /600.7968th pct
  • Assists /600.8146th pct
  • ixG /600.6848th pct
  • Goals above expected+5.684th pct

Play-driving

4th line
  • xGF% (5v5)49.3%52nd pct
  • CF% (5v5)49.5%55th pct
  • Relative xGF%−0.256th pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.536th pct

Usage

4th line
  • TOI per game11:4728th pct
  • PP time share8.1%36th pct
  • Offensive zone starts57.0%53rd pct
  • Quality of competition23.5%32nd pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Lindberg wins the draw over 2014–15 to 2018–19, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1015+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

50.1%

635–632 · #106 of 194 regulars, 46th percentile

Against an average centre

49.9%

Opponents won 49.8% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.2% against them.

Wins above average

−1

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

6.3

1,267 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

46%252 · +1.456%229 · +2.143%167 · +0.763%43 · +0.337%52 · +1.057%69 · +0.842%50 · +0.452%274 · +1.055%131 · +1.0Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone50.4% 200–197
  • Neutral zone47.6% 222–244
  • Defensive zone52.7% 213–191

By strength

  • Even strength50.0% 593–593
  • Power play57.8% 26–19
  • Shorthanded44.4% 16–20

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +14 after a win, −14 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.1 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2014–15540.0%32.2%
2015–1627748.4%48.3%
2016–1757552.0%51.6%
2017–1818752.9%53.3%
2018–1922345.3%45.1%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+5.6 goals above expected

01020304050100150200250Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−40−200+20+40+60