
Right wing · #25
Devante Smith-Pelly
- Age
- 34
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 183 cm
- Weight
- 101 kg
- Born
- Scarborough, CAN
- Draft
- 2010, round 2, #42 (ANA)
Career · 2011–12 to 2018–19
- Games
- 395
- Goals
- 44
- Points
- 101
- TOI per game
- 12:34
- xGF% (5v5)
- 46.1%
- Goals above expected
- −9.8
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
| 2011–12 | 49 | 7 | 6 | 13 | −7 | 12:03 | 66 | 10.6% | 2 | 6.9 | 47.6% | |
| 2012–13 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −4 | 9:00 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.2 | 35.1% | |
| 2013–14 | 19 | 2 | 8 | 10 | +5 | 12:39 | 23 | 8.7% | 0 | 2.5 | 49.0% | |
| 2014–15 | 54 | 5 | 12 | 17 | +1 | 14:39 | 76 | 6.6% | 1 | 7.3 | 47.5% | |
| 2014–15 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 3 | −2 | 13:18 | 28 | 3.6% | 0 | 1.5 | 42.2% | |
| 2014–15 | All teams | 74 | 6 | 14 | 20 | −1 | 14:17 | 104 | 5.8% | 1 | 8.8 | 46.3% |
| 2015–16 | 46 | 6 | 6 | 12 | −2 | 11:00 | 60 | 10.0% | 0 | 5.1 | 47.3% | |
| 2015–16 | 18 | 8 | 5 | 13 | −1 | 15:35 | 34 | 23.5% | 1 | 4.4 | 48.6% | |
| 2015–16 | All teams | 64 | 14 | 11 | 25 | −3 | 12:18 | 94 | 14.9% | 1 | 9.6 | 47.8% |
| 2016–17 | 53 | 4 | 5 | 9 | −19 | 13:30 | 76 | 5.3% | 2 | 6.9 | 40.9% | |
| 2017–18 | 75 | 7 | 9 | 16 | −6 | 12:21 | 103 | 6.8% | 0 | 10.7 | 47.5% | |
| 2018–19 | 54 | 4 | 4 | 8 | −6 | 10:51 | 60 | 6.7% | 0 | 8.2 | 44.8% | |
| Total | 4 teams | 395 | 44 | 57 | 101 | −41 | 12:34 | 531 | 8.3% | 6 | 53.8 | 46.1% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2011–12 to 2018–19 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
4th line
23rd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
4th line- Goals /600.5337th pct
- Assists /600.6934th pct
- ixG /600.6545th pct
- Goals above expected−9.810th pct
Play-driving
4th line- xGF% (5v5)46.1%25th pct
- CF% (5v5)44.7%13th pct
- Relative xGF%−3.128th pct
- Penalty diff /600.0749th pct
Usage
3rd line- TOI per game12:3443rd pct
- PP time share11.7%43rd pct
- Offensive zone starts49.3%32nd pct
- Quality of competition23.7%44th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often Smith-Pelly wins the draw over 2011–12 to 2018–19, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1539+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
35.7%
92–166 · below the 1539 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
36.5%
Opponents won 50.8% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.2% against them.
Wins above average
−35
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
2.0
258 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone31.7% 33–71
- Neutral zone36.7% 33–57
- Defensive zone40.6% 26–38
By strength
- Even strength34.8% 64–120
- Power play40.7% 11–16
- Shorthanded36.2% 17–30
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +21 after a win, −7 after a loss. Each win was worth 0.8 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Patrice Bergeron27.3% 3–8
- Claude Giroux33.3% 3–6
- James Sheppard42.9% 3–4
- Sean Monahan40.0% 2–3
- Matt Cullen0.0% 0–5
- Mike Fisher40.0% 2–3
- Mark Scheifele0.0% 0–4
- Ryan Nugent-Hopkins25.0% 1–3
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011–12 | 21 | 28.6% | 27.2% |
| 2013–14 | 4 | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| 2014–15 | 83 | 27.7% | 29.2% |
| 2015–16 | 5 | 40.0% | 40.2% |
| 2016–17 | 71 | 40.8% | 41.4% |
| 2017–18 | 33 | 48.5% | 48.9% |
| 2018–19 | 41 | 39.0% | 40.4% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−9.8 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games