Eastern Conference · Metropolitan Division
Pittsburgh Penguins
2018–19·44–26–12·100 points·3rd in the Metropolitan, 6th in the Eastern·Clinched playoff spot
- Points
- 100#8
- Goal differential
- +33#5
- xGF% (5v5, adj.)
- 52.7%#10
- Power play
- 24.6%#5
- Penalty kill
- 79.7%#19
- GSAx
- +0.5#15
Skaters
Everyone who played for the Penguins. Traded players show only their games for this team. Use Columns for advanced stats.
| 79 | 35 | 65 | 100 | +18 | 21:00 | 220 | 15.9% | 29 | 28.6 | +6.4 | 57.3% | |
| 82 | 27 | 55 | 82 | −19 | 17:59 | 215 | 12.6% | 36 | 24.4 | +2.6 | 49.1% | |
| 82 | 40 | 36 | 76 | +13 | 19:21 | 227 | 17.6% | 11 | 28.2 | +11.8 | 55.5% | |
| 68 | 21 | 51 | 72 | −25 | 18:48 | 187 | 11.2% | 26 | 20.7 | +0.3 | 52.3% | |
| 65 | 16 | 40 | 56 | +13 | 25:58 | 206 | 7.8% | 19 | 12.1 | +3.9 | 54.9% | |
| 69 | 18 | 19 | 37 | −3 | 15:29 | 197 | 9.1% | 12 | 24.5 | −6.5 | 54.4% | |
| 72 | 18 | 17 | 35 | +10 | 15:54 | 141 | 12.8% | 0 | 16.5 | +1.5 | 50.9% | |
| 71 | 8 | 20 | 28 | +8 | 13:19 | 121 | 6.6% | 3 | 11.2 | −3.2 | 58.9% | |
| 76 | 3 | 20 | 23 | +31 | 21:02 | 99 | 3.0% | 0 | 4.8 | −1.8 | 55.2% | |
| 71 | 7 | 13 | 20 | +6 | 11:31 | 87 | 8.0% | 0 | 8.9 | −1.9 | 48.7% | |
| 57 | 2 | 17 | 19 | +13 | 17:57 | 72 | 2.8% | 5 | 3.1 | −1.1 | 54.7% | |
| 43 | 8 | 9 | 17 | +12 | 13:39 | 76 | 10.5% | 0 | 7.7 | +0.3 | 52.0% | |
| 32 | 11 | 6 | 17 | +8 | 15:11 | 72 | 15.3% | 0 | 7.7 | +3.3 | 53.9% | |
| 40 | 9 | 6 | 15 | −6 | 14:56 | 62 | 14.5% | 2 | 6.6 | +2.4 | 43.2% | |
| 29 | 2 | 13 | 15 | 0 | 20:30 | 47 | 4.3% | 6 | 3.5 | −1.5 | 46.1% | |
| 60 | 1 | 13 | 14 | +9 | 18:35 | 74 | 1.4% | 4 | 3.1 | −2.1 | 52.5% | |
| 44 | 9 | 5 | 14 | −6 | 13:13 | 81 | 11.1% | 2 | 7.5 | +1.5 | 49.3% | |
| 32 | 9 | 5 | 14 | +4 | 15:45 | 94 | 9.6% | 3 | 9.3 | −0.3 | 55.5% | |
| 82 | 1 | 12 | 13 | −4 | 19:17 | 86 | 1.2% | 2 | 3.9 | −2.9 | 47.4% | |
| 36 | 4 | 7 | 11 | +5 | 15:52 | 35 | 11.4% | 0 | 1.9 | +2.1 | 52.6% | |
| 28 | 6 | 4 | 10 | +7 | 11:03 | 33 | 18.2% | 0 | 3.2 | +2.8 | 49.5% | |
| 49 | 7 | 2 | 9 | −7 | 12:39 | 60 | 11.7% | 0 | 6.7 | +0.3 | 47.1% | |
| 50 | 2 | 6 | 8 | +2 | 7:37 | 54 | 3.7% | 0 | 5.4 | −3.4 | 53.4% | |
| 37 | 2 | 3 | 5 | +3 | 16:41 | 43 | 4.7% | 2 | 2.5 | −0.5 | 49.2% | |
| 25 | 2 | 3 | 5 | +3 | 9:02 | 26 | 7.7% | 0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 52.6% | |
| 16 | 0 | 4 | 4 | −7 | 8:34 | 16 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.2 | −1.2 | 46.8% | |
| 16 | 1 | 2 | 3 | +2 | 15:27 | 28 | 3.6% | 0 | 3.1 | −2.1 | 53.0% | |
| 18 | 1 | 1 | 2 | −9 | 16:17 | 22 | 4.5% | 0 | 0.6 | +0.4 | 57.7% | |
| 19 | 0 | 2 | 2 | +7 | 18:58 | 22 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.8 | −0.8 | 58.3% | |
| 6 | 0 | 2 | 2 | +2 | 5:18 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.2 | −0.2 | 51.5% |
Goalies
Save percentage treats every shot alike; GSAx credits goalies for the difficulty of the shots they faced.
| 50 | 50 | 29 | 14 | 6 | .919 | 2.69 | 4 | +3.9 | .753 | |
| 36 | 30 | 15 | 11 | 5 | .916 | 2.75 | 3 | +0.4 | .748 | |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .887 | 3.50 | 0 | −3.8 | – |
Player cards
Pick a player to see where they rank among everyone at their position, and who they most resemble statistically.
Overall rating
Starter
81st percentile among qualified goalies, blending goaltending 75%, usage 25%.
- Starter
- Backup
- Third string / AHL
Goaltending
Starter- Save %.91983rd pct
- GSAx+3.958th pct
- GSAx /600.0859th pct
- High-danger SV%.75338th pct
- Medium-danger SV%.87871st pct
- Low-danger SV%.97464th pct
- Rebound control+0.8881st pct
- GAA (lower is better)2.6963rd pct
Usage
Starter- Games started5073rd pct
- Shots faced /6033.2183rd pct
- xG faced /602.7744th pct
Percentiles among goalies with 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Who plays the tough minutes?
Coaches shelter some players with offensive-zone starts and weaker opponents, and trust others with the hardest assignments. Skaters with 100+ minutes at 5-on-5.
Across: share of zone starts in the attacking end (sheltered usage to the right). Up: quality of the opponents faced. Bubble size is 5-on-5 ice time; colour is relative xGF%, blue when the team does better with the player on the ice.