Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Oct 8, 2010·Joe Louis Arena, Detroit

Anaheim Ducks 0, Detroit Red Wings 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 81% of the time.

DET winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA060906021
DET21227024443

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:11DETJohan FranzenGWGAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Todd Bertuzzi · Snap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:35DETMike ModanoAssists: Daniel Cleary, Brad Stuart · Snap, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P2 5:29DETPavel DatsyukAssists: Henrik Zetterberg, Brian Rafalski · Tip-in, 0.06 xG0–3
  4. P2 16:55DETDaniel ClearyAssists: Pavel Datsyuk · Tip-in, 0.02 xG0–4
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 9:08ANABobby Ryan: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 13:04ANACorey Perry: Misconduct10 min
  3. P2 13:04DETRuslan Salei: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 13:04DETTomas Holmstrom: Misconduct10 min
  5. P2 13:04ANAAndy Sutton: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 7:41ANARyan Getzlaf: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 7:41ANACorey Perry: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 7:41DETPavel Datsyuk: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 7:41ANARyan Getzlaf: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 7:41DETHenrik Zetterberg: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 10:07ANAGeorge Parros: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 10:07ANAGeorge Parros: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 12:03DETTomas Holmstrom: Hooking2 min
  14. P3 16:23ANABobby Ryan: Interference2 min
  15. P3 16:23ANASheldon Brookbank: Fighting5 min
  16. P3 16:23DETBrad Stuart: Fighting5 min
  17. P3 17:01ANADan Sexton: Too many men on the ice2 min
  18. P3 17:36ANAPaul Mara: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Filppula
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANADET
21Shots on goal43
2.0Expected goals4.0
43Shot attempts74
19Faceoffs won35
1Power plays6
46Penalty minutes26
26Hits21
20Blocked shots8
5Giveaways8
13Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Perry – Ryan10:47

    xG 0.64–0.23 (74%)attempts 15–7goals 0–1

  2. Parros – Chipchura – Sexton4:41

    xG 0.13–0.09 (59%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Marchant – Bodie – Beleskey5:07

    xG 0.05–0.07 (40%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

  4. Selanne – Koivu – Blake7:41

    xG 0.12–0.24 (35%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrookbank – Mikkelson7:30

    xG 0.42–0.06 (87%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

  2. Sutton – Visnovsky11:27

    xG 0.63–0.31 (67%)attempts 14–7goals 0–1

  3. Mara – Fowler13:00

    xG 0.43–0.33 (56%)attempts 11–14goals 0–0

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. Holmstrom – Datsyuk – Zetterberg8:23

    xG 0.27–0.30 (47%)attempts 6–9goals 1–0

  2. Modano – Cleary – Hudler8:14

    xG 0.21–0.25 (45%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  3. Eaves – Miller – Helm6:27

    xG 0.17–0.24 (42%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  4. Bertuzzi – Filppula – Franzen10:53

    xG 0.21–0.29 (43%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLidstrom – Rafalski3:20

    xG 0.20–0.09 (69%)attempts 5–2goals 2–0

  2. Rafalski – Kronwall3:07

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  3. Salei – Stuart2:20

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 4.0 xGANA 2.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 3/100 · #1205 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.49 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 81% of the time.

DET winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).