Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 9, 2010·St. Pete Times Forum, Tampa

Atlanta Thrashers 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 57% of the time.

TBL winsATL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ATL0132918330
TBL2202917536

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:23TBLSteve DowniePPAssists: Ryan Malone, Brett Clark · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:21TBLDominic MooreAssists: Teddy Purcell, Sean Bergenheim · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:20TBLVincent LecavalierPPAssists: Martin St. Louis, Steven Stamkos · Slap, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P2 5:21TBLSteven StamkosGWGAssists: Victor Hedman, Steve Downie · Tip-in, 0.09 xG0–4
  5. P2 16:31ATLToby EnstromPPAssists: Niclas Bergfors, Andrew Ladd · Slap, 0.08 xG1–4
  6. P2 18:12ATLBen EagerUnassisted · Snap, 0.05 xG2–4
  7. P3 7:41ATLChris ThorburnAssists: Brent Sopel, Ben Eager · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–4
  8. P3 10:59TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Randy Jones · Tip-in, 0.13 xG3–5
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:39ATLRich Peverley: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  2. P2 1:21ATLToby Enstrom: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 5:48TBLBrett Clark: Interference2 min
  4. P2 8:13ATLChris Thorburn: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P2 8:13TBLSteve Downie: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P2 8:51TBLVictor Hedman: Holding2 min
  7. P2 11:27TBLPavel Kubina: Interference2 min
  8. P2 13:42ATLRon Hainsey: Holding2 min
  9. P2 15:30TBLVictor Hedman: Tripping2 min · PPG
  10. P2 15:48TBLDominic Moore: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  11. P3 4:13TBLVincent Lecavalier: High sticking2 min
  12. P3 14:20ATLDustin Byfuglien: Interference2 min
  13. P3 19:51ATLBen Eager: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ATL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← ATL attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lecavalier won the faceoff against Antropov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ATLTBL
30Shots on goal36
2.2Expected goals2.6
63Shot attempts61
24Faceoffs won34
6Power plays5
12Penalty minutes14
16Hits18
17Blocked shots12
8Giveaways7
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Atlanta Thrashers

Forward lines

  1. Thorburn – Eager – Burmistrov8:43

    xG 0.26–0.32 (44%)attempts 5–8goals 2–0

  2. Modin – Antropov – Dawes9:41

    xG 0.41–0.49 (46%)attempts 11–8goals 0–2

  3. Ladd – Bergfors – Little9:15

    xG 0.18–0.42 (30%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  4. Stewart – Peverley – Kane8:50

    xG 0.26–0.72 (26%)attempts 9–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEnstrom – Bogosian2:40

    xG 0.11–0.02 (84%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  2. Enstrom – Byfuglien13:34

    xG 0.58–0.65 (47%)attempts 19–13goals 0–2

  3. Sopel – Hainsey7:52

    xG 0.24–0.35 (41%)attempts 7–10goals 1–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestSt. Louis – Downie – Stamkos8:05

    xG 0.80–0.27 (75%)attempts 13–8goals 2–0

  2. Moore – Bergenheim – Purcell6:56

    xG 0.49–0.17 (74%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  3. Hall – Thompson – Tyrell5:52

    xG 0.34–0.04 (88%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  4. Lecavalier – Gagne – Malone9:05

    xG 0.28–0.32 (46%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKubina – Lundin12:01

    xG 0.83–0.42 (66%)attempts 16–11goals 1–0

  2. Clark – Hedman11:53

    xG 0.52–0.20 (72%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

  3. Jones – Vernace6:35

    xG 0.52–0.29 (64%)attempts 10–8goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.6 xGATL 2.2 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLATL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it ATL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #185 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.99 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
ATL 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 57% of the time.

TBL winsATL wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − ATL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).