Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 21, 2010·Pepsi Center, Denver

San Jose Sharks 4, Colorado Avalanche 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 75% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS11321417434
COL11506110231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:43COLKyle CumiskeyAssists: Chris Stewart · Slap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:11SJSScott NicholAssists: Jamal Mayers, John McCarthy · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:08SJSJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Dany Heatley, Patrick Marleau · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 8:44SJSJoe PavelskiPPGWGAssists: Dany Heatley, Patrick Marleau · Wrist, 0.61 xG3–1
  5. P3 7:25COLMilan HejdukAssists: Chris Stewart, John-Michael Liles · Wrist, 0.30 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:48SJSLogan CoutureENAssists: Douglas Murray, Dan Boyle · Wrist, 0.54 xG4–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P2 0:29COLMatt Duchene: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 7:13COLKevin Porter: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 7:59COLTJ Galiardi: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 10:34COLMatt Duchene: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 6:38SJSDan Boyle: Interference2 min
  6. P3 9:04COLCody McLeod: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 9:04SJSRyane Clowe: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 9:08SJSNiclas Wallin: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 16:16COLMatt Duchene: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 16:29SJSDany Heatley: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  11. P3 19:19COLChris Stewart: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stastny won the faceoff against Thornton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
34Shots on goal31
3.7Expected goals2.1
61Shot attempts47
34Faceoffs won24
5Power plays3
8Penalty minutes22
21Hits23
9Blocked shots14
6Giveaways5
8Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestMitchell – McGinn – Couture5:04

    xG 0.48–0.00 (100%)attempts 12–1goals 0–0

  2. Mayers – Nichol – McCarthy7:07

    xG 0.35–0.03 (92%)attempts 7–5goals 1–0

  3. Pavelski – Mitchell – McGinn4:12

    xG 0.20–0.06 (76%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – Marleau – Heatley6:01

    xG 0.27–0.22 (55%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHuskins – Demers13:36

    xG 0.51–0.41 (55%)attempts 13–15goals 0–0

  2. Wallin – Vlasic13:56

    xG 0.46–0.39 (54%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

  3. Boyle – Murray15:04

    xG 0.47–0.53 (47%)attempts 16–12goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestYip – Galiardi – Duchene2:01

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Stastny – Stewart – Galiardi10:59

    xG 0.49–0.52 (48%)attempts 9–11goals 1–1

  3. Hejduk – Yip – Duchene12:06

    xG 0.30–0.36 (45%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  4. Winnik – McLeod – O'Reilly11:01

    xG 0.25–0.33 (44%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHannan – Cumiskey3:25

    xG 0.39–0.04 (91%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. Liles – Wilson12:23

    xG 0.30–0.20 (60%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

  3. Foote – Liles2:13

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.1 xGSJS 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 44/100 · #647 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.20 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 75% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).