Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #12

Scott Nichol

San Jose Sharks St. Louis Blues(traded during the season)
Age
51
Shoots
Right
Height
173 cm
Weight
81 kg
Born
Edmonton, CAN
Draft
1993, round 11, #272 (BUF)

Career · 2009–10 to 2012–13

Games
245
Goals
12
Points
35
TOI per game
10:41
xGF% (5v5)
48.2%
Goals above expected
−4.2

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10SJS7941519013:04934.3%16.8–
2010–11SJS56437−39:45616.6%04.044.8%
2011–12STL80358−59:19674.5%04.449.9%
2012–13STL30101−29:47137.7%01.051.6%
Total2 teams245122335−1010:412345.1%116.248.2%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.850100150200
6m8m10m12m14m16m50100150200Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2012–13 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

Extra / AHL

7th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

Extra / AHL
  • Goals /600.288th pct
  • Assists /600.5314th pct
  • ixG /600.373rd pct
  • Goals above expected−4.224th pct

Play-driving

4th line
  • xGF% (5v5)48.2%36th pct
  • CF% (5v5)48.7%41st pct
  • Relative xGF%−6.213th pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.0929th pct

Usage

Extra / AHL
  • TOI per game10:4118th pct
  • PP time share0.5%3rd pct
  • Offensive zone starts32.8%5th pct
  • Quality of competition22.4%4th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Nichol wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2012–13, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 727+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

59.7%

1182–799 · #2 of 179 regulars, 99th percentile

Against an average centre

59.3%

Opponents won 49.6% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.4% against them.

Wins above average

+184

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

8.2

1,981 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

58%333 · +0.356%187 · +1.364%292 · +1.455%76 · +0.663%106 · −0.158%96 · 0.064%94 · +0.154%170 · +2.761%627 · +0.7Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone60.8% 304–196
  • Neutral zone59.4% 418–286
  • Defensive zone59.2% 460–317

By strength

  • Even strength59.8% 962–647
  • Power play59.5% 22–15
  • Shorthanded59.1% 192–133

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +9 after a win, −14 after a loss. Each win was worth 0.9 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–1082860.7%60.5%
2010–1148559.4%58.7%
2011–1245057.6%57.2%
2012–1321860.6%60.4%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−4.2 goals above expected

05101550100150200Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60+80